41.0 is not really a fraction but, if you had to write it as a fraction and also show the precision, you should write it as 410/10. The simplified form, 41/1, does not show the precision.41.0 is not really a fraction but, if you had to write it as a fraction and also show the precision, you should write it as 410/10. The simplified form, 41/1, does not show the precision.41.0 is not really a fraction but, if you had to write it as a fraction and also show the precision, you should write it as 410/10. The simplified form, 41/1, does not show the precision.41.0 is not really a fraction but, if you had to write it as a fraction and also show the precision, you should write it as 410/10. The simplified form, 41/1, does not show the precision.
727 is an integer and so there is not really a sensible way of writing it as a fraction or mixed number.
16 is an integer, not a fraction. There is not really a sensible way of writing it as a fraction or mixed number.
128 is an integer, not a fraction. There is not really a sensible way of writing it as a fraction. However, if you must, you can use (128*k)/k where k is any non-zero integer as an equivalent fraction.
36 is an integer and not a fraction. However, it can be expressed in rational form as 36/1 which cannot be simplified.
41.0 is not really a fraction but, if you had to write it as a fraction and also show the precision, you should write it as 410/10. The simplified form, 41/1, does not show the precision.41.0 is not really a fraction but, if you had to write it as a fraction and also show the precision, you should write it as 410/10. The simplified form, 41/1, does not show the precision.41.0 is not really a fraction but, if you had to write it as a fraction and also show the precision, you should write it as 410/10. The simplified form, 41/1, does not show the precision.41.0 is not really a fraction but, if you had to write it as a fraction and also show the precision, you should write it as 410/10. The simplified form, 41/1, does not show the precision.
515 is an integer and so there is not really a sensible way of writing it as a fraction or mixed number.
340 is an integer and so there is not really a sensible way of writing it as a fraction or mixed number.
727 is an integer and so there is not really a sensible way of writing it as a fraction or mixed number.
To find the fraction of 20 that is 140, you need to divide 140 by 20. This calculation gives you 7, meaning that 140 is 7 times larger than 20. Therefore, the fraction of 20 that is 140 is 7/1 or simply 7.
16 is an integer, not a fraction. There is not really a sensible way of writing it as a fraction or mixed number.
Not really. 24 100 is an integer and not a fraction. However, it can be expressed in rational form as 24100/1 which cannot be simplified.
128 is an integer, not a fraction. There is not really a sensible way of writing it as a fraction. However, if you must, you can use (128*k)/k where k is any non-zero integer as an equivalent fraction.
36 is an integer and not a fraction. However, it can be expressed in rational form as 36/1 which cannot be simplified.
Not really...simplified it becomes: 90/2 = 45x2/2 = 45 Which is a whole number with no fraction, and hence not strictly "mixed". However if a question asks for a result to be "simplified to a mixed number" then it is saying do not leave any improper fraction as such but convert them to a mixed number or just a whole number if there is no fractional bit (as in this case).
If by "54" you mean ".54", then that decimal converted to a fraction is 54/100, which can be simplified to 27/50.If by "54" you mean ".54545454... etc" (repeating), that decimal converted to a fraction is 6/11.(WikiAnswers really needs to allow periods in their questions, it's not your fault.)
1.06666666667 is a fraction. It is a fraction in decimal form rather than in the form of a ratio. However, that does not stop it being a fraction. Its rational equivalent is 106666666667/100000000000 which cannot be simplified.