Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
110 000
Although O is round already, letters can't be rounded mathematically. I suppose you could write 0.00, but zero is zero.
60
34.92 rounded to the nearest sixteenth is 34.9375
It is 8.6
110 000
To round 157 to the nearest ten thousand, we look at the digit in the ten thousand place, which is 0. The digit to the right of it, the thousands place, is 1. Since 1 is less than 5, we keep the digit in the ten thousand place the same and change all digits to the right to 0. Therefore, 157 rounded to the nearest ten thousand is 0.
When rounding 299 to the nearest thousand, we look at the hundreds place, which is a 2 in this case. Since the hundreds place is less than 5, we round down. Therefore, 299 rounded to the nearest thousand is 0.
7900
22000
48 rounded o the nearest 10 is 50
0.56
100
To round 34.87 to the nearest whole number, you would look at the digit in the tenths place, which is 8. Since 8 is greater than or equal to 5, you would round up the digit in the ones place by 1, making it 35. Therefore, 34.87 rounded to the nearest whole number is 35.
Although O is round already, letters can't be rounded mathematically. I suppose you could write 0.00, but zero is zero.
60
Generally in rounding off i have found that on an average when you round off a 3 place decimal the impact of that round off is only 1/900-1000 of the actual value if we combine the data gathered from quantitative measurements o weight and volume in real life I would say numbers from 499,900 to 50,900 should be rounded off to give 500,000 I own a repair company in India called repair 24/7 . you can search it on Instagram as repairkarwao24x7 and binarepair on google. Daily I have to deal with similar calculations and this is generally the principle I follow