16.53 = 1653/100
Chat with our AI personalities
Well, honey, let's break it down for you. 1653 divided by 4 equals 413.25 - and last time I checked, you can't have a quarter of a person or a quarter of a number. So no, 1653 is not divisible by 4. Math doesn't lie, darling.
Using a calculator, it is simple to find the answer is 1653
Pascal's tiangle first appear in the year 1653.
He first used it in 1653, but it remained unpublished until 1665. See the related link below:
There cannot be a whole fraction. If it is a fraction it is not whole and if it is whole it is not a fraction.