16.53 = 1653/100
Chat with our AI personalities
Well, honey, let's break it down for you. 1653 divided by 4 equals 413.25 - and last time I checked, you can't have a quarter of a person or a quarter of a number. So no, 1653 is not divisible by 4. Math doesn't lie, darling.
Using a calculator, it is simple to find the answer is 1653
He first used it in 1653, but it remained unpublished until 1665. See the related link below:
Pascal's tiangle first appear in the year 1653.
There cannot be a whole fraction. If it is a fraction it is not whole and if it is whole it is not a fraction.