16.53 = 1653/100
Well, honey, let's break it down for you. 1653 divided by 4 equals 413.25 - and last time I checked, you can't have a quarter of a person or a quarter of a number. So no, 1653 is not divisible by 4. Math doesn't lie, darling.
Using a calculator, it is simple to find the answer is 1653
He first used it in 1653, but it remained unpublished until 1665. See the related link below:
Pascal's tiangle first appear in the year 1653.
There cannot be a whole fraction. If it is a fraction it is not whole and if it is whole it is not a fraction.
33.06 = 3306/100 or 1653/50 in fraction
1, 3, 19, 29, 57, 87, 551, 1653
in 1653
No!
Sir Isaac Newton's stepfather, Barnabas Smith, died in 1653.
August 1653
1653
5193.05265638
1653
It is 0.1754386
1632-1653
1649-1653