to find square feet multiply length by width. in this example 40x60 the answer is square feet 40x60=2400sqft
2,400 square feet (40 x 60 = 2,400).
Thickness? Do you mean cement or concrete - cement is the binder/adhesive in the concrete.
If that's 40 x 60 feet, it's 2400 square feet.
The term "40X60 zoom" refers to the magnification capabilities of optical devices such as binoculars or telescopes. The "40X" part signifies that the object being viewed appears forty times closer than it does to the naked eye. The "60" refers to the diameter of the objective lens in millimeters, which determines how much light can enter the device, affecting the brightness and clarity of the image seen.
It is very simple.just do it by yourself by calling your neighbour asking for help. Try this.
If a 412 pitch means a one third pitch then 20% needs to be added on to the area to be covered. So, for a 40ft x 60ft building, the total area to be covered is 40x60 = 2400 sq ft. Adding 20% or 480 sq ft this comes to 2880 sq ft. Next work out the area of the plywood sheets. Lets say 10ft x 5ft or 50 sq ft. So the total number of sheets is total area needed divided by the area of the sheets. That works out to 2880/50 = 57.6 or 58 sheets. A useful table for working out the area of a roof for various pitches is at the web link below.
The cost depends on many factors, such as the size of the tent, the labor required to construct and take down the tent, delivery fees, and of course the rental period. Make sure the party tent you want to rent is weatherproof! As well, add ons such as liner and draping, side walls, flooring and lighting can add to the cost. All of that being said, a basic 40x60 foot tent rental runs around $5000 and can go up rapidly from there.
To calculate the energy used by the 60 watt light bulb running for 5 seconds, first convert the power from watts to kilowatts (60 watts = 0.06 kilowatts). Then, multiply the power by the time to get the energy used (0.06 kW * 5 s = 0.3 kilojoules).
You solve the equation by manipulating it until you have only "x" on one side.12/8 = (x/40) - xSo we can multiply both sides by 40 to get rid of the x/40:12/8 * 40 = x - 40x60 = -39xx = 60/-39x = -1.538 (to 3 decimal places only)IF you actually meant (and this is why it is important to write our questions as accurately as possible else mathematicians will assume you are using the agreed conventions):12/8 = x/(40 - x) thenx = 12/8 * (40 - x)x = 60 - 1.5x2.5x = 60x = 24
form_title= Metal Buildings form_header= Create a strong and sturdy metal building. What is the purpose of metal building?*= _ [50] What are the wanted dimensions of the building?*= _ [50] What is your budget for the building?*= _ [50]
What is the worst light for standard portrait photography?Over the past 25 years, most in New York City and Long Island, I was fortunate enough to have photographed over 3,000 weddings. My photographing (please do not say 'shooting a wedding; it distinguishes you from the amateur photographers), a wedding was 5 to 8 hours per affair and generally 3 to 4 weddings per weekend, 120 to 200 photographs per wedding.The number of 120-200 photos may seem a very small amount, but remember, all this was on film, (medium format or size 120 film with 12 exposures per roll. Every shot counted and there were no more than 2 photographs for every pose, (hopefully no one blinked twice).For those of you who remember 120 film, it did come in 24 exposures on a roll, but being fearful of either my losing a roll or the lab losing a roll, the worse a lost roll could hurt me was in 12 and not 24 photographs.We only used 120 format cameras for 2 distinct reasons; first we needed the larger size negative to be able to enlarge almost everything to 8x10 or 16x20. 35mm, although I owned 3 rigs of equipment did not have the finer grain. I had to be prepared to blow up a "cropped Image" to 16x20. Many times the wedding couple loved their photo together surrounded by all the groomsmen and bride maids. Imagine the equivalent of enlarging a 35mm negative to a 40x60". The print quality would completely fall apart and the resulting print would be worthless. Brides do not like the phrase "it won't work". They only like "OK". And secondly, and this was just a small perk of using medium format cameras at a Wedding, it intimidated other family or friend photographers and they stayed out of my way. Please don't misunderstand, I never told a guest at a wedding not to take photographs, I just did not have the time to waste having someone else take over the photo session. I did all my groups and family groups and then when done, I turned them over to anyone else. By that time the Bride & Groom were either exhausted or starving, but I did what I was being paid to do and got all the pictures I needed.But weddings from the late 1960's to mid 1980's only happened on a Saturday or Sunday. So, during the week days, I was available in the studio to have photographed every type of portrait imaginable. I hope to be able to provide the reader with my experience regarding the taking of portraits. In art, as in photography there is no such thing as an absolute, i.e., no one can label themselves the "final authority" on portraits.First off, this question assumes that there is such a thing as a 'standard portrait'.There are many types of portraits and I list most of them below. What makes the lighting good in one scenario will make that same lighting setup totally unacceptable in another scenario.In addition, most of the lighting is accomplished with one or more flash (strobe) lights on stands or held by assistants. I will also address using available light, with and without accompanying flash.Let's look at some versions of the 'standard portrait':License, passport, ID cards and all other Identification photosYearbook, resume, business card and trade magazine photosWedding, couple at new years type party, photos out of a studio and on location 'done quickly'Portraits in studio or very controlled environmentsPortraits indoors or outdoors on location mixing available light and flashLet's examine each item above:#1 Identification photos require what is called "flat lighting". Most if not all of the light comes from in directly in front of the subject, or all from camera angle. This will result in a bland evenly lit photo without shadows. The subject's shoulders and face are turned completely to camera angle. This lighting will produce the best ID photo and rather crisp looking photographs. Three examples I can think of right away would be Passport, Drivers License, and Police Mug shots.Almost everyone who has had one of these types of photographs taken will complain that they look "terrible", and flat lighting does exactly that. It's almost as if there is only 2 dimensions to the subject in these photos.As in painting, the artist is faced with trying to turn a 2d object, either a canvas or a photograph, into something with depth, hence a 3rd dimension. In both mediums, it is done with the use of light to render shadows and higher tones of light. In black and white it is generally accepted that there are 7 or 9 (depending on the school of thought), visible values of black to white. In color, which should logically be the same sceaniro, I really believe we are restricted to only 6 true values.So, getting back to the first kind of portraits, the joke I made to clients when they cringed at their Passport photos was, "If you really look like the picture, then you do need a vacation."I'll be back for the rest of the types of portraits.