65 = 5 x 13
5 and 2 are prime numbers, and thus can't be factorized any further. So the prime factorization of 5 would be 5, and the prime factorization of 2 would be 2. :)
Expressed in its simplest form, 36 can be factorized as 32 x 22.
No 65 is not prime since it has factors of 1 and 65 or 1*65=65 and 5 and 13 or 5*13=65. Prime numbers have only 1 and that number as its factors.
Prime factorization of 45 is 3x3x5. Prime factorization of 65 is 5x13.
The prime numbers that go into 65 are 5 and 13. This is because 65 can be factored into 5 × 13, where both 5 and 13 are prime numbers. Therefore, the prime factorization of 65 is 5 and 13.
74*22 it was already prime factorized.
144 is the answer to 122 so can be easily prime factorized as 2x2x2x2x3x3 72 is 9x8, so can be prime factorized as 2x2x2x3x3 These two numbers, therefore, have in common prime factors of 2, 2, 2, 3 and 3. Their greatest common factor is 72.
5 and 2 are prime numbers, and thus can't be factorized any further. So the prime factorization of 5 would be 5, and the prime factorization of 2 would be 2. :)
Expressed in its simplest form, 36 can be factorized as 32 x 22.
Expressed in factorized form, 2200 = 23 x 52 x 11.
No 65 is not prime since it has factors of 1 and 65 or 1*65=65 and 5 and 13 or 5*13=65. Prime numbers have only 1 and that number as its factors.
No, 50 and 65 are not relatively prime.
Prime factorization of 45 is 3x3x5. Prime factorization of 65 is 5x13.
No. 65 = 1 * 65 65 = 5 * 13
The prime factors of 65 are 5 and 13.
The prime factorization of 65 is 5 x 13.
There isn't a prime number between 63 and 65