Gödel's theorem states that it is impossible to make a complete set of mathematical axioms that can explain every truth about arithmetics.
This means that no matter how you define the fundamental axioms of mathematics, there have to be certain statements that are true within mathematics that can not be formally proved by using the fundamental axioms. This theorem pretty much shattered the mathematician's dream of describing all of mathematics within a framework of a limited number of logical axioms. Nevertheless, the axiomatic Zermelo-Frankel set theory is able to explain all of the known mathematics from fundamental axioms, but philosophically it is still not a complete theory.
Although the theorem is extremely complicated, it can be understood by anybody with a basic mathematical knowledge. This link shows a version of the proof:
http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/kenny/papers/godel.html
No, not at all. The Incompleteness Theorem is more like, that there will always be things that can't be proven. Further, it is impossible to find a complete and consistent set of axioms, meaning you can find an incomplete set of axioms, or an inconsistent set of axioms, but not both a complete and consistent set.
Plane geometry.
Mathematics is a proximate science because 1+1=2 and that is definite.It's a fact and proven by theorem therefore it is academically accepted without furthermore questioning.
Norton's theorem is the current equivalent of Thevenin's theorem.
You cannot solve a theorem: you can prove the theorem or you can solve a question based on the remainder theorem.
No, not at all. The Incompleteness Theorem is more like, that there will always be things that can't be proven. Further, it is impossible to find a complete and consistent set of axioms, meaning you can find an incomplete set of axioms, or an inconsistent set of axioms, but not both a complete and consistent set.
science is science......................^_^
Plane geometry.
science cannot answer questions about what people should do
Sometimes Yes, as in Pythagoras' Theorem. Other times No, for as Godel's Incompleteness Theorem shows, there will be complete bodies of knowledge in which there will be truths that cannot be proven, and falsities which cannot be denied. [I paraphrase his theorem.]
Technology and Science were important parts of the ancient Greece. Hippocrates is referred "The Father of Modern Medicine while Pythagoras invented the Pythagorean Theorem which is widely used in Science.
It might involve psychology. Coaching can use science by knowing the limits of physiology of a person.
which statement best describe the limit of science
It was in the science of trigonometry that Pythagoras' theorem states that for any right angle triangle that when its hypotenuse is squared that it is equal to the sum of its squared sides.
no only ac, im a science and math professsor
Mathematics is a proximate science because 1+1=2 and that is definite.It's a fact and proven by theorem therefore it is academically accepted without furthermore questioning.
For math, Pythagoras created the Pythagorean Theorem during that time.