A.N.D. Leibniz defined the binary number system.
Neither. The property of prime or composite is not defined for 1, just as it is not defined for 0 or 0.5.
because it is e
9 is a square number less than 16. The number 9, in itself, has no probability since there is no "experiment" defined.9 is a square number less than 16. The number 9, in itself, has no probability since there is no "experiment" defined.9 is a square number less than 16. The number 9, in itself, has no probability since there is no "experiment" defined.9 is a square number less than 16. The number 9, in itself, has no probability since there is no "experiment" defined.
The largest defined number is a Graham's number.
A.N.D. Leibniz defined the binary number system.
0
Neither. The property of prime or composite is not defined for 1, just as it is not defined for 0 or 0.5.
A mole.
The atomic number, the number of protons
No
yes it can be defined more commonly as a ratio between the number of and numbr of possible outcomes
it is defined as such.
Same number of protons, different number of neutrons.
Yes. Graham's number.
no
because it is e