A.N.D. Leibniz defined the binary number system.
Neither. The property of prime or composite is not defined for 1, just as it is not defined for 0 or 0.5.
because it is e
9 is a square number less than 16. The number 9, in itself, has no probability since there is no "experiment" defined.9 is a square number less than 16. The number 9, in itself, has no probability since there is no "experiment" defined.9 is a square number less than 16. The number 9, in itself, has no probability since there is no "experiment" defined.9 is a square number less than 16. The number 9, in itself, has no probability since there is no "experiment" defined.
The largest defined number is a Graham's number.
A.N.D. Leibniz defined the binary number system.
0
Neither. The property of prime or composite is not defined for 1, just as it is not defined for 0 or 0.5.
A mole.
The atomic number, the number of protons
yes it can be defined more commonly as a ratio between the number of and numbr of possible outcomes
No
it is defined as such.
Yes. Graham's number.
Same number of protons, different number of neutrons.
no
because it is e