As an improper fraction: 23/1
As a decimal: 23.0
In scientific notation: 2.3*10^1
As a Roman numeral: XXIII
It is simply a different way of writing the same thing.
23 is an integer, not a fraction. There is not really a sensible way of writing it as a fraction. However, if you must, you can use (23*k)/k where k is any non-zero integer as an equivalent fraction.
xxx is an integer and so there is no sensible way of writing it as a mixed number.
It is a way of grading writing.
The number of different ways to string a necklace of 23 pearls depends on whether the pearls are identical or distinct. If the pearls are distinct, the number of arrangements is (23!) (23 factorial). If the pearls are identical, there is only one way to string them. If there are groups of identical pearls, the calculation would require dividing by the factorial of the counts of each group.
It is: 23/1000 km or 23 cm
Isn't
Twenty-three is the written way, but we usually use 23 in writing.
poems have a different structure
Writing skills theories are different interpretation or views of the skill which is writing. Writing is a way of communication and writing skill is the ability to produce a piece of text.
no it is way different
It is simply a different way of writing the same thing.
23 is an integer, not a fraction. There is not really a sensible way of writing it as a fraction. However, if you must, you can use (23*k)/k where k is any non-zero integer as an equivalent fraction.
Well there different because they used signs or wedges wich is different from our way of writting
hieroglyhics writing is different from our writing today because our writing is based on the alphabet and theis is not
xxx is an integer and so there is no sensible way of writing it as a mixed number.
it is different from expository writing because expository writing is not as formal