no, factors of a number would be less than that of the original number. A prime number is a number that has factors of only itself and 1.
13 is a prime number. The only prime factor of a prime number is the number itself.
A prime number has only one prime factor, and that prime factor is the number itself.
The only prime factor of 16 is 2.
a prime number
No prime number only has one factor. Each prime number has itself and 1 as factors. Now, the number 1 of course has only one factor, but it is technically not a prime number.
no, factors of a number would be less than that of the original number. A prime number is a number that has factors of only itself and 1.
13 is a prime number. The only prime factor of a prime number is the number itself.
Small words make a difference. No prime number "has" a factor of 16. But 2 is the only prime number that "is" a factor of 16.
71 is a prime number and its only prime factor is itself. Its only other factor is 1, which is not a prime number.none because 71 is prime71 is a prime number and its only prime factor is itself. Its only other factor is 1, which is not a prime number.none because 71 is prime
A prime number has only one prime factor, and that prime factor is the number itself.
41 is a prime number. Its only prime factor is 41.
prime factor = prime number which can be divided into the given number with no remainder ie 2
2 is a prime number because its only factors are one and itself. Since 2 is a prime number, if it is a factor of your number, it is a prime factor.
103 is a prime number. The only two factors of a prime number are 1 and itself. The only factor pair of 103 is 1 x 103. There is only one factor pair of a prime number. The proper factors of 103 are only 1 or, if the definition you are using excludes 1, there are none. The only prime factor of 103 is 103. There is only one prime factor of a prime number - itself. The distinct prime factor (listing each prime factor only once) of 103 is also 103.
The only prime factor of 16 is 2.
a prime number