No the kilometers are bigger than meters. There are 1000 meters in a kilometer.
The unit multiplier for kilometers is 1000. (One kilometer equals 1000 meters.) So 60 kilometers x 1000 meters/kilometer yields 60,000 meters.
meters
To compare meters with kilometers both has to be converted to the same unit. 3 kilometers equal 3000 meters therefore 30 meters are less than 3 kilometers.
A kilometer is one thousand meters. So yes, a kilometer is larger.
Larger, since the meter is the smaller unit.
You can convert kilometers to meters, or square kilometers to square meters. But you can't convert kilometers (a linear unit) to square meters (a square unit).
No the kilometers are bigger than meters. There are 1000 meters in a kilometer.
Square meters or square centimeters are typically used when dealing with smaller areas, as square kilometers or acres would be impractical for such measurements.
kilometers
The unit multiplier for kilometers is 1000. (One kilometer equals 1000 meters.) So 60 kilometers x 1000 meters/kilometer yields 60,000 meters.
4.07 kilometers = 4 kilometers 70 meters or 4,070 meters 4.5 kilometers = 4 kilometers 500 meters or 4,500 meters 4.07 kilometers is shorter than 4.5 kilometers.
meters
To compare meters with kilometers both has to be converted to the same unit. 3 kilometers equal 3000 meters therefore 30 meters are less than 3 kilometers.
There are a thousand meters in a kilometer. So a meter is much smaller, by a factor of 1,000.
By unit of length and distance and conversion ,we can say that meters are the s.i unit of lengths not the kilometers.
A kilometer is one thousand meters. So yes, a kilometer is larger.