The answer will depend on the exact definition of both "whole number" and "counting number" as both terms are potentially open to different interpretations.
For example, a counting number could be defined as all the positive integers, e.g. 1,2,3,4 etc... A whole number could be defined as all the non negative integers, e.g. 0,1,2,3,4 etc.. In which case the answer would be 0.
However, it could be argued that counting numbers include 0, making the above answer invalid. Equally it could be argued that whole numbers include the negative integers, in which case the answer would include any negative whole number.
They are not. 0 (which is a whole number) is not considered a counting number(natural #).
All counting numbers ARE (not is!) a proper subset of the set of whole numbers.
No. Counting numbers are whole numbers.
Apart from poor spelling, this question is based on a fallacy. Counting numbers and whole numbers are NOT the same. For example, -3 is a whole number but it is not a counting number.
yes it is
Yes, counting numbers are a proper subset of whole numbers.
They are not. 0 (which is a whole number) is not considered a counting number(natural #).
All counting numbers ARE (not is!) a proper subset of the set of whole numbers.
The counting numbers are the whole numbers that start at 1 and end at infinity. Although zero is considered a whole number, it is not a counting number.
The product of a whole number with a whole number is a whole number. A whole number is an integer ( a counting number).
No. Counting numbers are whole numbers.
'0' is the only whole number that is not a counting number. Negative integers do not belong to whole numbers.
Apart from poor spelling, this question is based on a fallacy. Counting numbers and whole numbers are NOT the same. For example, -3 is a whole number but it is not a counting number.
Yes, it is.
It is both.
yes
Yes.