They are the same. The quotient of the equation: 160/8 = 20 is 20, which has only one zero. The dividend of this equation is 160, which also has only one zero. Therefore they both have the same number of zeros
trunc(79/35) = 2
because if there is no number for x, you have to think to yourself, there is only 1 x and that would make it the 1.
There are lots of ways to do this, but here's one:(99 - 9) / 9 = 10By the way, you probably mean "expression" rather than "equation." The equation includes both sides of the equals sign, so it isn't written only with 9's.
The equation contains variables which are only raised to the first power.
(5x5)+(5x5)-(5/5)
That equation cannot be solved since there are 2 unknown in the equation (x and y) but only 1 equation. The number of unknowns must be equal to the number of equations (for simultaneous equations)
-4
1111111 is a larger number than 0999999 because 0999999 actually only equals 999,999 while 1111111 equals 1,111,111. One million one hundred eleven thousand, one hundred eleven is larger than nine hundred ninety nine thousand, nine hundred ninety-nine. Hope that helps :)
They are the same. The quotient of the equation: 160/8 = 20 is 20, which has only one zero. The dividend of this equation is 160, which also has only one zero. Therefore they both have the same number of zeros
trunc(79/35) = 2
because if there is no number for x, you have to think to yourself, there is only 1 x and that would make it the 1.
There are lots of ways to do this, but here's one:(99 - 9) / 9 = 10By the way, you probably mean "expression" rather than "equation." The equation includes both sides of the equals sign, so it isn't written only with 9's.
The equation contains variables which are only raised to the first power.
This equation is unsolvable since there are two unknowns and only one equation. You would require a second equation in order to solve it.
There's no way to make an equation out of only a number.
no nine is not a cubed number. Only 1 and 8 are the cubed number between 0 to 10.