1/k something over 1
No. This is not true. It is false. The equation is an example of direct variation.
The additive inverse property states that for any number ( a ), there exists an additive inverse ( -a ) such that ( a + (-a) = 0 ). An example of an equation that illustrates this property is ( 5 + (-5) = 0 ). This shows that adding a number and its additive inverse results in zero.
Logarithmic equation
To find the inverse, replace y with x, and x with y. So, the inverse of the equation is: x = 4yWhich is equal to:y = x/4
-2 is the additive inverse of +2
No. This is not true. It is false. The equation is an example of direct variation.
The additive inverse property states that for any number ( a ), there exists an additive inverse ( -a ) such that ( a + (-a) = 0 ). An example of an equation that illustrates this property is ( 5 + (-5) = 0 ). This shows that adding a number and its additive inverse results in zero.
Logarithmic equation
To find the inverse, replace y with x, and x with y. So, the inverse of the equation is: x = 4yWhich is equal to:y = x/4
The equation is xy = 22.5
-2 is the additive inverse of +2
It is difficult to be certain. Limitations of the browser used by Answers.com means that we cannot see most symbols. Please resubmit your question spelling out the symbols as "plus", "minus", "equals". If the question is about xy = 7, then it is an equation of an inverse relationship. This is NOT the same as an inverse equation.
Change all the signs. Suppose you have the quadratic equation: y = ax2 + bx + c Its additive inverse is -ax2 - bx - c.
In an inverse relationship, one variable decreases while the other increases. As an equation, a basic inverse relationship looks like x = 1/y.
To find the multiplicative inverse, you would have to solve the equation 0 times x = 1. Since any number times 0 is zero, this equation has no solution.
3 + (-3) = 0
How about 3 + (-3) = 0