A proper subset B of a set A is a set all of whose elements are elements of A nad there are elements of A that are not elements of B. It follows, then, that an improper subset must be the whole set, A. That is, A is an improper subset of A
Recall that Improper subset of A is the set that contains all and only elements of A. Namely A. So does the empty set have all of A provided A is not empty? Of course not! The empty set can be only considered an improper subset of itself.
If you have a set S, the only improper subset of S is S itself. An improper subset contains all elements of S and no others. It is therefore equivalent to S. For example if S ={1,2,3} then the improper subset is {1,2,3}, and an example proper subset is {1,2}.
no
Improper
An improper subset is identical to the set of which it is a subset. For example: Set A: {1, 2, 3, 4, 5} Set B: {1, 2, 3, 4, 5} Set B is an improper subset of Set Aand vice versa.
A proper subset B of a set A is a set all of whose elements are elements of A nad there are elements of A that are not elements of B. It follows, then, that an improper subset must be the whole set, A. That is, A is an improper subset of A
Recall that Improper subset of A is the set that contains all and only elements of A. Namely A. So does the empty set have all of A provided A is not empty? Of course not! The empty set can be only considered an improper subset of itself.
If you have a set S, the only improper subset of S is S itself. An improper subset contains all elements of S and no others. It is therefore equivalent to S. For example if S ={1,2,3} then the improper subset is {1,2,3}, and an example proper subset is {1,2}.
no
Improper
She received a warning for her improper conduct during the meeting.
An improper subset is identical to the set of which it is a subset. For example: Set A: {1, 2, 3, 4, 5} Set B: {1, 2, 3, 4, 5} Set B is an improper subset of Set Aand vice versa.
Two
if A element exis in set B thiscalled proper sub set
First of all, the null set( denoted by is a subset of every set. But it being a proper set or improper set is debatable. Many mathematicians regard it as an improper set, and rightly have as when we say a set is a subset of another, the super set always contains at least one element. For eg,. Let A be the set, in roster form we take it as: A = {ϕ}, we clearly see n(A)=1 then P(A) = {ϕ,{ϕ}} We observe that at least a set must have 1 element for it to have a proper set, but if we take A = ϕ ( i.e. n(A)=0), then clearly ϕ and A itself are improper sets of A and. Hence the minimum amount of proper sets a set has is nil and improper is 2. But I have seen a few high school text books who regard null set as a proper set, which is totally false, arguable by mathematicians, clearly signifying the lethargy of authors of the book failing to update their error driven books. I assure you, that null set is an improper set of every set.
Yes because they can be expressed as improper fractions