answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Negligence

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is called When damages are apportioned according to the degree a plaintiff contributed to his or her injury?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

What are non pecuniary damages?

Non-pecuniary damages, also known as non-economic damages, refer to compensation awarded to a plaintiff in a legal case for intangible losses that cannot be easily quantified in monetary terms. These damages may include pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, and loss of consortium or companionship. They are meant to compensate for the physical and psychological harm endured by the plaintiff, rather than financial losses.


What does rancid mean?

it means messy like the word ransack which is when someone damages property


What is non pecuniary relief?

Non-pecuniary relief is also called equitable relief. It is the type of relief given where money damages cannot adequately redress the damages suffered. In contract and tort actions, money damages, or pecuniary relief, is usually sufficient to adequately compensate the injured party. But there are instances where money damages are not adequate. Some examples are : injunctions to prohibit injurious behavior before it happens as in labor disputes; partitions of real estate when co-owners cannot get along; setting aside of wills: forcing specific performance of certain kinds of contracts; the modern actions in lieu of prerogative writs.


Is it good for earthquakes to happen?

Neither, It kills and damages lots of people/houses but It creates new land witch could be useful, but It's better it didn't happen.


If walking barefoot damages carpet how long would it take if one person walked barefoot up a 12 step staircase 4 times a day to damage the carpet?

15 years

Related questions

What is coutributory negligence?

Contributory negligence is a legal concept where a plaintiff's own actions or behavior are considered to have contributed to their own injury or loss. In some jurisdictions, if it is determined that the plaintiff's negligence contributed to the incident, they may be barred from recovering any damages.


What is it called when all or part of the damages may have been caused by the behavior or action of the plaintiff?

This is known as contributory negligence or comparative negligence. Contributory negligence applies when the plaintiff's own actions contributed to their injuries, potentially barring them from recovering any damages. Comparative negligence, on the other hand, allows for a partial recovery based on the degree of fault attributed to the plaintiff.


What kind of damages can a plaintiff recover if a defendant's actions have been fraudulent wanton or outrageous?

The kind of damages a plaintiff can recover if a defendant's actions have been fraudulent, wanton, or outrageous depends on the damages to the plaintiff. If the actions are wanton, the damages tend to be higher than if they are simply fraudulent.


What are 5 defenses that are available to a defender in a negligence action?

Contributory negligence: The plaintiff's own negligence contributed to the harm suffered. Assumption of risk: The plaintiff voluntarily assumed the risk of the activity that led to the harm. Comparative negligence: The plaintiff's damages are reduced by the percentage of their own negligence. Lack of duty: The defendant did not owe a duty of care to the plaintiff. Statute of limitations: The plaintiff did not file the lawsuit within the specified time limit.


What must a plaintiff prove to win damages in a tort suit?

A plaintiff must prove four elements to win damages in a tort suit: duty of care owed by the defendant, breach of that duty, causation between the breach and the harm suffered by the plaintiff, and actual harm or damages resulting from the breach. If any of these elements is not proved, the plaintiff's case may fail.


If plaintiff receives compensation under an insurance policy then the damages that a defendant migh have to pay?

If a plaintiff receives compensation under an insurance policy, the damages that a defendant might have to pay could be reduced by the amount of the insurance payment the plaintiff received. This is to prevent the plaintiff from being overcompensated for their losses. The defendant would only be responsible for paying the remaining portion of the damages not covered by the insurance.


How can plaintiff be used in a sentence?

A plaintiff is a person who sues another. An example of the word plaintiff used in a sentence might be, "The plaintiff was suing the defendant over the broken lease and the alleged damages to the apartment."


What are negligence elements a plaintiff has to prove in a suit for damages on account of the negligence of the defendant?

In general, a plaintiff in a negligence claim must prove the following elements: duty of care owed by the defendant to the plaintiff, breach of that duty by the defendant, causation (both actual and proximate) between the defendant's breach and the plaintiff's injury, and damages suffered by the plaintiff as a result of the defendant's breach.


Equitable remedies are available anytime the plaintiff chooses them over money damages?

If the plaintiff ASKS for, or agrees to ACCEPT, an equitable remedy, this could be true statement.


In legal terms what are exemplary damages?

Exemplary damages, also known as punitive damages, are additional compensation awarded to the plaintiff in a civil lawsuit to punish the defendant for egregious behavior and to deter future similar conduct. They are meant to go beyond simply compensating the plaintiff for losses suffered and to act as a form of punishment.


What are Damages intended to punish a defendant and deter the defendant from engaging in the same tortuous conduct in the future?

Punitive damages are monetary damages that are awarded to punish a defendant who either intentionally or recklessly injured the plaintiff.


What is Georgia's last clear chance rule under its comparative negligence laws?

Georgia's last clear chance rule in its comparative negligence laws states that even if the plaintiff's negligence contributed to the accident, the defendant can still be held liable if they had the last clear chance to avoid the accident but failed to do so. This rule allows the plaintiff to recover damages even if they were partially at fault.