402 is divisible by 2.402 is divisible by 2.402 is divisible by 2.402 is divisible by 2.
1114 is divisible by 2.1114 is divisible by 2.1114 is divisible by 2.1114 is divisible by 2.
When you move from the set of integers to the set of rational numbers.
no.. for example 6,12,18 are divisible by 2..but not divisible by 8.
It is divisible by their factors. It is also divisible by their product.
1.PuRe oBliGAtIon 2.cOnDItIonAl oBligAtiOn 3.oBliGatIon wItH a pErIod4.aLtErnAtiVe obLIgAtiOn 5.facultatIve oBliGatIon 6.jOiNt oBliGatIon7.sOlIdAry oBliGAtiOn 8.dIvIsiBle obLigAtion 9.inDiViSiBle oBLigAtion10.oBlIGatIOn wIth a pEnaL cODe
divisible
multiplication
The prefix that can be added to the word "divisible" is "in-". So the word becomes "indivisible".
Indivisible obligations are those that cannot be divided or shared among multiple parties. Each party involved is responsible for fulfilling the entire obligation, and it cannot be separated into distinct parts.
Since 11161 is an odd number, it is indivisible by 6.
It means not able to be divided. So instead of using " not divisible" you can say "indivisible." Examples: Atoms were considered an indivisible unit of matter. In the Pledge of Allegiance, we refer to the US as one indivisible nation.
The word is "indivisible," and it means "unable to be broken apart."
No. Atoms are now considered to consist of several minor particles. And atoms dividing is what provides the energy for nuclear power plants. So atoms are NOT indivisible. They ARE divisible.
No, Aristotle did not believe in the existence of atoms. He believed that all matter was continuous and infinitely divisible.
No, 159398 is not divisible by 8. 1. In this case, last three digits (398) are not divisible by 8, so the given number is not divisible by 8. 2. If 159398 is divided by 8, using division method, a remainder (6) is left, so it is indivisible by 8.
The state or property of being indivisible or inseparable; inseparability.