gogolplex one
gogolplex one
There is no limit to the number line. Since it is infinitely long, it is a fact that for each number in existence there is a number greater than it. So a number greater than "gogolplex", for example, would a gogolplex and one or two gogolplex. I'm not aware, however, of any number that is larger than a gogolplex that has been officially named if that's the question you're asking.
12
The gogolplex ( googolplex in English) is defined like high number 10 with the power gogol. A gogolplex writing would take place so much that there would not be enough of all the universe to write it.It can be noted:{10} ^ {\ rm gogol} ,10^ {10^ {100}} 10^ {\ scriptscriptstyle10 \, 000 \, 000 \, 000 \, 000 \, 000 \, 000 \, 000 \, 000 \, 000 \, 000 \, 000 \, 000 \, 000 \, 000 \, 000 \, 000 \, 000 \, 000 \, 000 \, 000 \, 000 \, 000 \, 000 \, 000 \, 000 \, 000 \, 000 \, 000 \, 000 \, 000 \, 000 \, 000 \, 000} no you got that wrong gogoplex is very high number, there is a number named gogo and it is 1 with 100 zeros and gogoplex has gogo zeros and you need an calculater bigger then the universe to get he number gogoplex!
This is a one, followed by 97 zeros. This is 1097 = 10 x 1096, which is called different names, depending on which system you use (See related link).American system: Ten UntrigintillionEuropean system: Ten Sexdecillion
I believe that's Infinity. (∞) that's the symbol for infinity. <><><> No name for number that big- but infinity is bigger.
A quark is a subatomic particle, so writing as small as a quark would require an incredibly tiny amount of space, essentially approaching the Planck length, which is the smallest meaningful length. In contrast, a googolplex is a very large number, significantly larger than the number of quarks in the observable universe. The paper or medium needed to write a googolplex would be practically infinite compared to the space needed to write as small as a quark.