It os 1/2*e2x + c
y = e2x+1
A polynomial equation: ax4+ bx3+ cx2+ dx + e = 0A trigonometric equation: sin(3x+2) = 0 Combinations: cos(x3+ e2x) = ln(x)A polynomial equation: ax4+ bx3+ cx2+ dx + e = 0A trigonometric equation: sin(3x+2) = 0 Combinations: cos(x3+ e2x) = ln(x)A polynomial equation: ax4+ bx3+ cx2+ dx + e = 0A trigonometric equation: sin(3x+2) = 0 Combinations: cos(x3+ e2x) = ln(x)A polynomial equation: ax4+ bx3+ cx2+ dx + e = 0A trigonometric equation: sin(3x+2) = 0 Combinations: cos(x3+ e2x) = ln(x)
Assuming integration is with respect to a variable, x, the answer is 34x + c where c is the constant of integration.
Integration by Parts is a special method of integration that is often useful when two functions.
It os 1/2*e2x + c
Derivative of e2x - y = 2e2x - dy/dx
3
I assume you mean e2x. I tried this at the Wolframalpha site (using the search term: "integrate e^(2*x)"; the site says it is e2x/2. This can be obtained by a simple substitution.
y = e2x+1
coth(x) = cosh(x)/sinh(x) = (ex + e-x)/ (ex - e-x) or (e2x + 1)/ (e2x - 1)
If you mean ex squared, the answer is e2x
e2x + ex = 0e2x = -exe2x / ex = -1ex = -1x = ln(-1)Actually, that's just a restatement of the original problem, but that'sas far as you can go with it, because there's no such thing as the log(or the ln) of a negative number. Your equation has no solution.
A polynomial equation: ax4+ bx3+ cx2+ dx + e = 0A trigonometric equation: sin(3x+2) = 0 Combinations: cos(x3+ e2x) = ln(x)A polynomial equation: ax4+ bx3+ cx2+ dx + e = 0A trigonometric equation: sin(3x+2) = 0 Combinations: cos(x3+ e2x) = ln(x)A polynomial equation: ax4+ bx3+ cx2+ dx + e = 0A trigonometric equation: sin(3x+2) = 0 Combinations: cos(x3+ e2x) = ln(x)A polynomial equation: ax4+ bx3+ cx2+ dx + e = 0A trigonometric equation: sin(3x+2) = 0 Combinations: cos(x3+ e2x) = ln(x)
INTEGRATION
Tapered integration is partial integration and not full vertical integration. Therefore tapered integration is when a firm both makes and buys similar products or services.
e2x=ex^2 basically means that x2=2x, in which case x2-2x=0, x = 0, 2. I don't think that's what the question meant. It could mean: e2x=(ex)2 . Which comes from one of the rules of exponents. Basically, look at it this way: Take the natural log of both sides: ln e2x= ln(ex)2 From rules of logs: (2x) ln e = (2) ln ex 2x ln e = (2) (x) ln e 2x = (2)(x)