If you meant scalene triangle, then it may have a right angle. By definition, a scalene triangle is a triangle with no angle or side measures that are the same. For example, a 30,60,90 triangle is scalene.
Assuming that a traingle is meant to be a triangle, then the answer is none.
As written, the statement is false. You can't have it both ways. I suspect you meant to write that dilating a triangle changes the size or area of the triangle but does not change its shape. That would be true.
I am assuming that "traingle" is meant to be triangle and "permeter" is meant to be perimeter.The area of a triangle cannot be equal to its perimeter because the area is a measure in 2-dimensional space whereas a perimeter is a 1-dimensional measure. So their dimensions will always be different.Furthermore, the area of a triangle is not determined by its perimeter. The area of a triangle can be changed - without affecting its perimeter - simply by changing the angles.
A triangle is a 2 dimensional object, it cannot therefore have a volume (which is a property of 3D objects.However, if you meant area, then it's half the base length multiplied by the height.
If you meant right angle then yes
If equelatiral is meant to be equilateral, then it is a triangle whose three sides are of equal length.
Nothing. Triangles don't have sines.
If you meant scalene triangle, then it may have a right angle. By definition, a scalene triangle is a triangle with no angle or side measures that are the same. For example, a 30,60,90 triangle is scalene.
The black triangle meant the prisoner was antisocial.
That will depend what "x" is, and what other information you know about the triangle.
The answer depends on what is meant by the number 5510.If 5510 is meant to refer to sides of length 5, 5 and 10 units then the answer is no.
I'm not sure why this is in the sports category, but the golden triangle is referencing one of the two major opium producing areas.
Assuming that a traingle is meant to be a triangle, then the answer is none.
That depends on what is meant by length of AD but the 3 sides of an equilateral triangle are all equal in lengths.
As written, the statement is false. You can't have it both ways. I suspect you meant to write that dilating a triangle changes the size or area of the triangle but does not change its shape. That would be true.
when a player makes a touchdown from the 30 line (3=triangle)