no
The answer is: an inference
Hypothesis
An observation is a direct measurement or recording of a phenomenon, while an inference is a conclusion drawn from observations or evidence. Observations provide concrete data, whereas inferences involve interpretation and reasoning that may introduce biases or assumptions. Thus, an observation cannot be an inference because they serve different roles in the process of understanding and analyzing information.
Statistical inference occurs when
By creating a strong inference, you can then put your ideas to the test. After close observation, you can then rule-out any incorrect guesses.
state why an observation cannot be an inference
state why an observation cannot be an inference
I think An observation about that inference is about that object.
observation is observation! :)inference is inference! :)Assuming you meant "Differentiate observation from inference ?" !....Observation is the act of being able to physically see an object - inference is implying something is real without physical proof of its existence.Incidentally - why was this put into the category 'animal life' !
inference
Inference is a logical interpretation. Observation is using your senses.
Inference is a logical interpretation. Observation is using your senses.
inference
An observation is something that can be seen with your own eyes, and an inference is something based on face. Therefore, an inference does not come before an observation, but rather after.
It is an inference
A observation
An observation is something that you see or measure. An inference is a conclusion usually based on the observation.