Countries that did not have the T-72 tank include the United States, the United Kingdom, and France, as they developed their own main battle tanks. Additionally, many small nations and those with limited military capabilities, particularly in Africa and the Pacific, also did not acquire the T-72. Some NATO member states opted for Western designs instead, further excluding them from operating this Soviet-era tank.
Possibly 72 ton, but there could be many more.....
In measuring dimensions, "t" typically stands for "thickness." It is commonly used in engineering, manufacturing, and architecture to specify the thickness of materials such as sheets, plates, or coatings. Understanding the thickness is crucial for ensuring structural integrity and proper fit in various applications.
2t - 12 - 3t = 60 -1t - 12 = 60 -1t -12 +12 = 60 + 12 -1t = 72 t = -72
In a mitre fillet weld with equal leg lengths, the design throat thickness (T) is typically calculated as 0.707 times the leg length (L). Therefore, the ratio of leg length to throat thickness can be expressed as L/T = L/(0.707L) = 1.414. This means the leg length is approximately 1.414 times the design throat thickness.
T-72
Well I'm not entirely sure but the Russian T-72 has 12 inch thick frontal armour however the M1A1 Abrams uses composite materials equivalent to 24 inches. The thickness no longer matters on a tank there are equally strong materials such as that found on the M1A1 Abrams.
Crew: 3
It uses the T-90 which is a modernized version of the T-72. T-72 tanks can be transformed into T-90 tanks through an update kit, which includes more solid, lighter armor and improves certain aspects.
Countries that did not have the T-72 tank include the United States, the United Kingdom, and France, as they developed their own main battle tanks. Additionally, many small nations and those with limited military capabilities, particularly in Africa and the Pacific, also did not acquire the T-72. Some NATO member states opted for Western designs instead, further excluding them from operating this Soviet-era tank.
Russian t-34 because their attack and speed was better but the tiger tank was slow and their attack was almost the same as Russian the tiger tank had better armor
Not only a tank has strong, hard armor that can protect itself from fires and explosions, but also a tank is very heavy. This cannot make t-rex bite down the tank or crushing it, and even if t-rex did that, it would hurt its foot. The tank will either ram into t-rex or shoot missiles at it.
A 1/72 T-64 would be exactly 3.01 cm tall, 4.73 cm wide and 12.81 cm long.
In terms of armor i'd say the British Challenger II tank But in terms of firepower i think it is Equal to USA's Abrams tank Both tanks use the Chobham armor but Challenger II uses a more advance class of chobham armor http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Challenger_2
To calculate the minimum wall thickness of a storage tank, you can use the formula derived from the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. The minimum thickness (t) is determined by considering the internal pressure (P), the diameter of the tank (D), and the allowable stress (S) of the material, typically expressed as ( t = \frac{P \cdot D}{2 \cdot S} + corrosion allowance ). Additionally, factors like external loads, buckling, and material degradation should be considered in the final design to ensure safety and regulatory compliance.
the prototype T-51b power armor in Fallout 3 is designed just like normal T-45d power armor but it does not sacrifice agility for armor rating and rad resistance.
They came up with the name under armor by the armor in the T-shirt or sweat shirt,Pants