The best approximation for the appearance of the first anatomically modern humans (Homo sapiens) is around 300,000 years ago in Africa. Fossil evidence suggests that these early humans had a mix of modern and archaic features, with a more rounded skull and smaller brow ridges compared to earlier hominins. Genetic studies indicate that they likely had dark skin, adapting to their environment, but full physical traits remain speculative due to limited fossil records.
The best approximation is, of course, the exact value. A reasonable approximation is 106.
What approximation is "best" depends on the required level of accuracy.
It is 60
There is no "best" approximation. The square root is irrational and so it is a non-terminating, non-recurring decimal so adding one more digit will always make it a better approximation.
20.1094005
The best approximation is, of course, the exact value. A reasonable approximation is 106.
What approximation is "best" depends on the required level of accuracy.
It is 60
There is no "best" approximation. The square root is irrational and so it is a non-terminating, non-recurring decimal so adding one more digit will always make it a better approximation.
20.1094005
11.5326
20.1
3.16227766 which is about 3.2
√40108 = 200.269817996
which is the best approximation of
I'd say 2.1 or 2.
Ivan Singer has written: 'Operation Turtle' 'The theory of best approximation and functional analysis' -- subject(s): Functional analysis, Approximation theory