100 is bigger and it is a rational number.
yes, it is rational because it isnt neverending. irrational numbers are neverending like pi which is 3.14-----------------------------------. it basically never ends. rationals such as 25 over 100 end if you divide 100 into 25. sources: my algebra book
No, 1.56 is not an irrational number; it is a rational number. Rational numbers can be expressed as the quotient of two integers, and 1.56 can be represented as 156/100. Since it can be expressed in this form, it is considered rational.
No 0.57 = 57/100 All decimal numbers which terminate or end with a repeating cycle of 1 or more digits are rational numbers. All decimal numbers that do not terminate and do not repeat are irrational.
No, 3.16 is not an irrational number; it is a rational number. Rational numbers can be expressed as the quotient of two integers, and 3.16 can be written as 316/100. Since it has a finite decimal representation, it qualifies as rational.
0.39 is a rational number because it can be expressed as a fraction of two integers. Specifically, it can be written as 39/100, where both 39 and 100 are integers. Since rational numbers are defined as numbers that can be expressed in this way, 0.39 qualifies as rational.
100 is rational. Rational numbers are numbers that can be written as a fraction. Irrational numbers cannot be expressed as a fraction.
yes, it is rational because it isnt neverending. irrational numbers are neverending like pi which is 3.14-----------------------------------. it basically never ends. rationals such as 25 over 100 end if you divide 100 into 25. sources: my algebra book
No, 1.56 is not an irrational number; it is a rational number. Rational numbers can be expressed as the quotient of two integers, and 1.56 can be represented as 156/100. Since it can be expressed in this form, it is considered rational.
109821
No 0.57 = 57/100 All decimal numbers which terminate or end with a repeating cycle of 1 or more digits are rational numbers. All decimal numbers that do not terminate and do not repeat are irrational.
No, 3.16 is not an irrational number; it is a rational number. Rational numbers can be expressed as the quotient of two integers, and 3.16 can be written as 316/100. Since it has a finite decimal representation, it qualifies as rational.
0.39 is a rational number because it can be expressed as a fraction of two integers. Specifically, it can be written as 39/100, where both 39 and 100 are integers. Since rational numbers are defined as numbers that can be expressed in this way, 0.39 qualifies as rational.
No, 7.27 is not an irrational number; it is a rational number because it can be expressed as the fraction 727/100. Rational numbers are those that can be represented as a ratio of two integers, and since 7.27 meets this criterion, it is classified as rational.
No, 625.89 is not an irrational number; it is a rational number. Rational numbers can be expressed as the ratio of two integers, and 625.89 can be written as 62589/100, which fits this definition. In contrast, irrational numbers cannot be expressed as a simple fraction and have non-repeating, non-terminating decimal expansions.
Rational 0.45 = 45 / 100
It is a rational number.
No, 7.73 is not an irrational number; it is a rational number. Rational numbers can be expressed as the quotient of two integers, and 7.73 can be written as 773/100. In contrast, irrational numbers cannot be expressed as a simple fraction and have non-repeating, non-terminating decimal expansions.