Unemployment/labor force * 100.
There is no correct way nor wrong way. Any method which consistently gives you the correct answer and with which you are comfortable is the correct way for you.I was aged over 60 when I learned a new way to factorise quadratics: a way which is easier than what I was taught at school all those years ago. My old method was not wrong, but I refer the new one. So for me, that is not the correct method.
The first answer you need is .40x720,000=288,000. The second answer is ON.
The correct way to write it is ' 120 '.The correct way to say it is "One hundred twenty".
The easiest way to calculate the value of a cash annuity would be to use an online annuity calculator. Some companies that feature this type of calculator on their website include Investopedia, Pine Grove, and Bank Rate.
The correct way to write 95 in standard form is 9.5 × 101
There is no correct way nor wrong way. Any method which consistently gives you the correct answer and with which you are comfortable is the correct way for you.I was aged over 60 when I learned a new way to factorise quadratics: a way which is easier than what I was taught at school all those years ago. My old method was not wrong, but I refer the new one. So for me, that is not the correct method.
The unemployment rate now is 2.2%. It has been this way since year 2005.
I assume you are referring to the fact that the unemployment rate reported by the government is the amount of people who are looking for jobs but unable to find them and suggesting that the "real" unemployment rate is how many people actually are not working. There are actually a few different measures for this, which are displayed neatly in a few graphs on the link I'm attaching. No one can say what the "real" unemployment rate is, mainly because of the way the unemployment rate is really calculated. The unemployment rate is the percentage of the American people who are drawing unemployment insurance. It doesn't include people whose unemployment insurance has run out, people who have removed themselves voluntarily from the employment pool (stay at home mothers, people living on trust funds, etc.) and people who haven't ever been employed. A rough estimate is to take the "unemployment rate" and double it.
It seems that unemployment rate averaged between 8 percent and 35 percent in 1933, the worst year of the Depression for unemployment. That is non-farm workers. And, you have to remember that establishing the rate was not as accurate as it is today. Lots of people during the Depression simply did not appear on the unemployment rate because there was no way of keeping track of who was looking for work or who had just given up and "rode the rails." There was not unemployment insurance back then. Also the farmers lost all of there crops and hoover cut taxes and gave more crops to the farmers.
The Phillips Curve is an inverse relationship between the rate of unemployment in an economy and the inflation. The lower the unemployment is, the higher inflation we get! Thus we can say that the Phillips Curve is negative (downward sloping)
Measure yourself before and after you eat
It should be--- He is at any rate, supposed to speak to them.
This is true, so the rate being thrown around is very misleading. This was made a big "talking point" in the 80s when they were also trying to downplay the recession, but I am not sure what the proper references are, although I used to. After unemployment runs out or if people change to "self-employed" or entrepreneurs no matter how underpaid they are they are no longer counted. This assisted the transition to many if the workforces being forced into temps jobs with little or no benefits, or being lost to homelessness or dire poverty. Also those getting welfare even in back to work programs are not counted.Here is an explanation of who are excluded, from an Answers.com discussion of the different types of unemployment, from an economist view point: See the Related Link below on Structural Unemployment.Hidden unemploymentHidden, or covered, unemployment is the unemployment of potential workers that is not reflected in official unemployment statistics, due to the way the statistics are collected. See the Related Link below.
Government corruption influence unemployment rate in developing countries in a huge way. Funds that can be used to create employment are embezzled and even investors shy away from setting up their business due to corruption levels and thus jobs are not created.
During his presidency, Obama did not change the way unemployment is calculated. The method for calculating unemployment remained consistent throughout his time in office.
There are several ways to calculate the .steam consumption rate. First would be to use a heat transfer equation. Another way would be to measure steam directly using flow metering equipment.
The NM unemployment rate is higher than what the government says, if they did it the right way we would be in the high 7's , there aren't nearly enough jobs and that's why thousands of people show up for minimum wage jobs, when they only have 100 to 200 positions available