No. A whole number is a number with no fractional (decimal) part. Therefore a decimal number can not be a whole number. Another view: 35.0 is a whole number AND a decimal. The fact that a number is a decimal does not automatically require it to have a fractional part. Even 35 is a decimal number (without a decimal point).
27.9 IS a decimal number. You can tell it is a decimal number because it has a decimal point (.).
7.5 is a decimal.
A decimal is a way of representing a number. There is no number after a number.A decimal is NOT a decimal point.
7.15 IS a decimal number.
It is a number with a decimal point. It is not necessarily a decimal number because 24 (no decimal pont) is a decimal number.It is a number with a decimal point. It is not necessarily a decimal number because 24 (no decimal pont) is a decimal number.It is a number with a decimal point. It is not necessarily a decimal number because 24 (no decimal pont) is a decimal number.It is a number with a decimal point. It is not necessarily a decimal number because 24 (no decimal pont) is a decimal number.
No. A whole number is a number with no fractional (decimal) part. Therefore a decimal number can not be a whole number. Another view: 35.0 is a whole number AND a decimal. The fact that a number is a decimal does not automatically require it to have a fractional part. Even 35 is a decimal number (without a decimal point).
A decimal number is not an integer. An integer is a number that is not a fraction, and decimal numbers are decimal fractions.
27.9 IS a decimal number. You can tell it is a decimal number because it has a decimal point (.).
1.30 is a decimal number
A number with two decimal points cannot be a decimal number.
7.5 is a decimal.
A decimal is a way of representing a number. There is no number after a number.A decimal is NOT a decimal point.
7.15 IS a decimal number.
9.6 is a decimal number because it has a decimal point inside
a negative decimal number, a rational number, a nice number
It depends. A terminating decimal is a rational number. A decimal which, after a finite number of places, becomes a repeating (or recurrent) decimal is also a rational number. A decimal that is not terminating, nor [eventually] settles into a recurring pattern is not a rational number. Note that the decimal need not become recurring immediately.