In chemical engineering, we deal with molar fluxes and I am very sure molar flux is not a vector, it is simply a scalar. molar flux cannot be negative because you cannot have - 5.0 moles of something flowing but I think you'll have to verify for other cases like magnetic flux and electrical fluxes
Luminous flux is measured in lumens (symbol: lm).
Using the Gauss' Law of Magnetism We know total flux will be zero flux(top)+flux(bottom)+flux(curved side)=0 ------- (a) flux(bottom)= -25e-3 (GIVEN) (-ve shows inward direction) flux(top)=B*A=(1.6e-3)*[3.14*(0.12)^2]=2.304e-5 Put the values in eq (a) you'll get flux(curved side)= +24.97e-3 (+ve shows direction is outward)
This theorem gives a relation between the total flux through any surface and net charge enclosed within the surface.
the flux goes about 95 km with a lipo battery.
the difference between lightning and a single cell battery
light speeeed mofos
when a current flow through the coil then flux produced around the coil . if the flux linked same produced coil only then the flux is said to be leakage flux. flux produced by one coil ,but linked with another coil then the flu is said to be mutual flux.
when a current flow through the coil then flux produced around the coil . if the flux linked same produced coil only then the flux is said to be leakage flux. flux produced by one coil ,but linked with another coil then the flu is said to be mutual flux.
i) leakage flux is those flux which goes through the air and linkage flux is those flux whose go through the cell. ii)leakage flux is the loss at flux but linkage flu is warning flux. iii)leakage flux is cause of eddy current loss and linkage flux is case of copper loss.
Flux helps promote soldering. Soldering paste might contain flux and other items to help promote soldering. The paste helps hold the flux in place while beginning to solder.
The magnetic flux passing the coil changes by its rotation thus induced emf is produced and induced current flows
An electrostatic force attracts oppositely charged particles.
In a Transformer, Core flux is the difference of primary flux and Secondary flux which are opposite to each other in direction. There difference is equal to the no load flux at all loads. So, some of primary flux passes through the core and remaining becomes leakage flux (Because Secondary flux forces it to get out of the core). Same is the case with Secondary flux. Now, flux is directly proportional to Voltage and Current. When Current increases due to increased load (and voltage remains same): Then both primary and secondary flux increase. Because both of them increase, so there difference remains same. And all remaining flux is forced out. Hence leakage flux increases with current, but Core flux remains constant. When Primary Voltage is increased: Then only primary flux increases. So difference of this new increased primary flux and previous same secondary flux increases. Hence Core flux increases with voltage, But leakage flux does not. That's how In transformer core flux depends on voltage whereas leakage flux depends on current.
The total flux across a Gaussian sphere enclosing an electric dipole is zero. This is because the electric field lines originating from the positive charge of the dipole cancel out the electric field lines terminating at the negative charge within the sphere, resulting in a net flux of zero according to Gauss's Law.
No. They all contain the same power flux capacitor units.
When an ionic compound dissolves in water, it dissociates into its constituent ions, which are free to move and carry electrical charge. These mobile ions can conduct electricity by allowing the flow of electric current between electrodes in the solution.