0
What is the hghest decimal number that can be representd by 2 binary digits bits?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Binary digits are 1 and 0
0 = 0
1 = 1
10 = 2
11 = 3
100 = 4
101 = 5
110 = 6
111 = 7
1000 = 8
So, 11 in binary is the highest which can be formed with two digits - and that equals 3 in decimal (base 10) numbering.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the hghest common factor of 10 and 16?
The GCF is 2.
What is the hghest common factor of 56 and 49?
The GCF is 7.
What is the hghest common factor of 21 and 36 and 60?
The GCF is 3.
What is the hghest thread count sheets ina bedding set on the market?
Egyptian cotton sheet sets & Pillow cases has the highest Thread count in single-Ply with 1500 thread count luxury sheet set.
What is the objective of the game gymnastics?
For one in gymnastics there are many apparati that gymnasts can perform on. Gymnasts need to trai constantly and have a very very high fitness level. The objecive in the sport is to get the hghest score by doing very difficult routines and paying attention to all the little details like sticking landing and keeping your legs straight while doing areial manouvers. judges watch your performance and give you a number based on how good they think your performance is. Sometimes in a competition gymnasts do various aparati, and then the tota score is added up at the end to determne a winner.
Are legal drugs more damaging to younger populations rather than illegal drugs?
The question you're asking is probably more sociological than medical. Just to try for an answer though, consider the following: Recreational Drugs The fact is, more money is spent on alcohol and tobacco related medical conditions than on anything in the illegal category, so we can conclude the extent and depth of physiological problems resulting from legal recreational drug use is both more widespread and does more damage. While the damage done by most drugs is a chronic affair, so it's hard to apply to younger populations, this is certainly where the "imprinting" or decision to include these drugs -- legal or otherwise -- into ones' social picture is made. It's therefore unreasonable to consider teen statistics without considering long term effects. Breaking Laws or Not The adoption of a lifestyle that invovles a high level of felonius activity, be it illegal drug use, burglary or whatever, has long time effects, some of which are difficult to determine. The effects in this case, however, are not related directly to the drug, but more to the lifestyle. Certainly, recidivist felons have a shorter life expentancy and a more difficult quality of life. The whys and wherefores of this adoption of lifestyle are beyond the scope of this response. Quasi-legal drugs This would include marijuana (depending on State law -- in places where this is a low-end misdemeanor or even jsut a violation), and perhaps boot leg ethanol. In both these case, the law and social stigma are not the same as they are for (a) more serious illegal drugs, (b) prescription drugs, and (c) legal recreational drugs like legally marketed alcohol. If the subject remains in a social situation where the law is not broken in a serious way (e.g. crimes against persons), the overall psychosocial effect is minimal -- they typically won't get shot by police lfeeing the seen of smoking a joint :}. In this case, where we've assumed a "normal" lifestyle and crime doesn't play a major role, by far the numerically most dangerous drugs are the legal forms of alcohol and tobacco, based on healthcare statistics and cash outlay (cash outlay is a pretty good tool for estimating damage). Criminology At one time, jurisprudence made a clear distinction between crimes against persons and other types of crime. A crime commited against a person with malice and intent was considered the hghest category of crime. This legal tenet reflected good psychology. Criminals who physicall and willfully attack other people are more dangerous to a society than criminals who commit crimes wherein no-one is physically hurt. In America, this is no longer the case, where a first time assault and battery convict will typically get far less jail time and fines than a first time drug seller. In simplistic terms, what this does is it puts non-violent offenders into the same population as extremely violent offenders, often to the extreme detriment of the non-violent offender. Without going into the question of right and wrong, it's fair to say that this exposes a large number of psychologically non-problematic people to those with severe, violent pathologies. And in that equation, we know who gets damaged. Summary * The effects of drugs is typically chronic, and therefore making an assessment of a younger population will yield results that are incomplete. * Habitual felons are more badly damaged than those that aren't, merely by the fact that the act is a felony, regardless of the underlying psychopathology it implies (e.g. you can be a felon for pacifistically selling drugs or aggressively attacking people -- the law does not reflect the depth of the pathology). * Youngsters who sell illegal drugs are far more likely to get into severe legal and sociological danger than those that don't. * Those who use legal drugs constitute a far larger segment of the medically compromised population than those who use illegal drugs.
What are facts about colonial New Jersey?
called bread basket colonies because the grew so much foodanswer by Logan!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
