46 is an integer. It is not a fraction.
46 is an integer, and there is no sensible way to represent it as a fraction.
No, the first integer, 23, is half the second, 46.
46 is an integer and not a fraction. However, it can be expressed in rational form as 46/1. You can then calculate equivalent rational fractions if you multiply both, its numerator and denominator, by any non-zero integer.
The only integer which will go into both is 1.
46 is an integer. It is not a fraction.
46 is an integer, and there is no sensible way to represent it as a fraction.
No, the first integer, 23, is half the second, 46.
46 is an integer and not a fraction. However, it can be expressed in rational form as 46/1. You can then calculate equivalent rational fractions if you multiply both, its numerator and denominator, by any non-zero integer.
46 is an integer and not a fraction. However, it can be expressed in rational form as 46/1 which cannot be simplified.
The number 46, as with any integer, is a rational number.
It is: 70% rounded to the nearest integer
7
A negative integer which is also a rational and a real number.
The only integer which will go into both is 1.
46 is an integer, not a fraction. There is not really a sensible way of writing it as a fraction or mixed number. However, if you must, you can use 46/1.
Yes, since 92 divided by 2 is 46, an integer.