2999
800
5000
600
-- If rounding to the nearest 300, then 749 is. -- If rounding to the nearest 200, then 699 is. -- If rounding to the nearest 150, then 674 is. -- If rounding to the nearest hundred, then 649 is. -- If rounding to the nearest twenty, then 609 is. -- If rounding to the nearest ten, then 604 is.
There is no universal "better". Rounding off is a trade-off between reducing the accuracy and simplifying calculations. Also, if there are other numbers in an addition that are rounded to the nearest hundred, there is no point in rounding your number to the nearest ten.
If rounding to the nearest ten: 795 If rounding to the nearest hundred: 750
800
Depends on what you are rounding to. Rounding to the nearest whole number, it is 10. Rounding to the nearest tens, it is still 10. Rounding to the nearest hundred, it is zero.
The largest number that round to 0 when when rounding to the nearest hundred (100) is 49.The smallest would be 1 if we consider whole numbers only.
No, it means rounding to the nearest whole number.The nearest whole number is the nearest one .The nearest whole number to 1.9 is 2 .So the nearest whole number to 1,624,381.9 is 1,624,382 .
5000
That would depend on what you were rounding it to. If rounding to the nearest whole number, then it does not need rounding. If rounding to the nearest ten, it would be 420. If rounding to the nearest hundred, it would be 400.
The answer depends on the degree of rounding. To the nearest hundredths, it is 5.79 To the nearest whole number, it is 6 To the nearest hundred, it is 0.
If you are rounding to the nearest one, it is 999.5 . If you are rounding to the nearest ten, it is 995. If you are rounding to the nearest hundred, it is 950. If you are rounding to the nearest thousand, it is 500.
When rounding any whole number 49 or less to the nearest hundred, the answer is zero.
Rounding the number 820 to the nearest hundred would bring it to 800.
600