There is no LAST natural number. According to Peano's axioms for numbers, every natural number has a successor.
there is a zero in a natural number.
The answer to this question is very hard to grasp and I am still not entirely sure I have got this right. Below is the list of statements that I believe to be true at the current time;Infinity is certainly not the largest natural number. It is not a counting number, therefore it is not a natural number.The Greek symbol omega is used to represent the first uncountable ordinal number. This would imply that omega is the first number after the one you are looking for.There is in fact no largest natural number, it is a purely conceptual number, the last number you could count to
No natural number is irrational.
Your question is not clear but i can write a program to find the sum of n natural numbers. #include<iostream.h> #include<conio.h> int main() { long int res=0; int last; cout<<"enter the last number."; cin>>last; for(int i=0;i<=last;i++) res=res+i; cout<<"Result is "<<res<<endl; return 0; }
There is no LAST natural number. According to Peano's axioms for numbers, every natural number has a successor.
Numbers are infinite, as a matter of fact counting decimals there are a infinite amount of numbers between 0 and 1. So depending on what you mean with natural numbers no, there is no natural last number.
Francium (Atomic Number 87), the Last Discovered Natural Element
The first 3 digit natural number is 100: 100 ÷ 4 = 25 → first 3 digit natural number divisible by 4 is 4 × 25 The last 3 digit natural number is 999: 999 ÷ 4 = 249 r 3 → last 3 digit natural number divisible by 4 is 4 × 249 → number of 3 digit natural numbers divisible by 4 is 249 - 25 + 1 = 225.
no..a natural number is a whole number
there is a zero in a natural number.
No, but is a natural number.
Depending on your definition of a natural number, 0 may or may not be a natural number. If you don't think 0 is a natural number, then it will be the only non-natural number that is whole.
A multiple of a natural number should be another natural number.
The answer to this question is very hard to grasp and I am still not entirely sure I have got this right. Below is the list of statements that I believe to be true at the current time;Infinity is certainly not the largest natural number. It is not a counting number, therefore it is not a natural number.The Greek symbol omega is used to represent the first uncountable ordinal number. This would imply that omega is the first number after the one you are looking for.There is in fact no largest natural number, it is a purely conceptual number, the last number you could count to
No natural number is irrational.
Your question is not clear but i can write a program to find the sum of n natural numbers. #include<iostream.h> #include<conio.h> int main() { long int res=0; int last; cout<<"enter the last number."; cin>>last; for(int i=0;i<=last;i++) res=res+i; cout<<"Result is "<<res<<endl; return 0; }