answersLogoWhite

0

It in Math, (Geometry) If p implies q is a true conditional statement and not q is true, then not p is true.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Math & Arithmetic

What the answer If p then q Not q Therefore not p modus tollens or what?

The argument "If p then q; Not q; Therefore not p" is an example of modus tollens. Modus tollens is a valid form of reasoning that states if the first statement (p) implies the second statement (q) and the second statement is false (not q), then the first statement must also be false (not p).


How do you write an modus ponens in symbols using letters and true-functional connectives?

Modus Ponens can be written in the following way symbolically:p --> qpTherefore qWhere the lowercase letters can be any statement, "-->" represents an arrow for a conditional statement, and use three dots arranged in a triangle to represent "therefore."


Words that mean the same as procedure?

Setup, strategy, action, agenda, process, formula, layout, method, modus operandi...


What is your observation if you differentiate 2-butanone and 2-methylbutanal using tollens reagent and 24-DNPHwrite the equation involved?

When differentiating 2-butanone and 2-methylbutanal using Tollens' reagent, 2-methylbutanal (an aldehyde) will reduce the reagent to form a silver mirror, whereas 2-butanone (a ketone) will not react. With 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (2,4-DNPH), both compounds will react to form yellow or orange precipitates because they both contain carbonyl groups. The reactions can be summarized as follows: For 2-methylbutanal with Tollens' reagent: [ \text{RCHO} + \text{Ag}^+ \rightarrow \text{RCOO}^- + \text{Ag} \downarrow ] For 2-butanone and 2,4-DNPH: [ \text{RCO} + \text{2,4-DNPH} \rightarrow \text{RCO-NH-C(=N^+-OH)(C_6H_3(NO_2)_2)} + \text{H}_2O ] (forms a yellow-orange precipitate)


What is the proof of the modus ponens not by the truth table?

1)p->q 2)not p or q 3)p 4)not p and p or q 5)contrudiction or q 6)q

Related Questions

What is the difference between modus tollens and modus ponens in deductive reasoning?

Modus tollens and modus ponens are both forms of deductive reasoning. Modus tollens is when you deny the consequent to reject the antecedent, while modus ponens is when you affirm the antecedent to affirm the consequent.


What are the type of logic?

modus ponens and modus tollens


What is the difference between modus ponens and modus tollens in deductive reasoning?

Modus ponens is a deductive reasoning rule that affirms the consequent, while modus tollens is a rule that denies the antecedent. In simpler terms, modus ponens says if A then B, and B is true, so A must be true. Modus tollens says if A then B, but B is false, so A must be false.


What does modus tollens means in english?

Mudus Tollens = "the way that denies by denying"


How do you write an argument using modus ponens and modus tollens?

If today is MONDAY then tomorrow is Tuesday.


What is the English equivalent of the Latin phrase 'modus tollens'?

method of removing is the latin phrase of modus tollen


Is modus tollens a valid form of deductive reasoning?

Yes, modus tollens is a valid form of deductive reasoning where if the consequent of a conditional statement is false, then the antecedent must also be false.


What are the laws of inference?

Law of detachment Law of contropositive law of modus tollens chain rule (law of the syllogism) law of disjunctive infrence law of the double negation de morgans laws law of simplication law of conjunction law of disjunctive addition


What are the applications of modus tollens?

Modus tollens is a valid form of deductive reasoning that is commonly used in mathematics, philosophy, and science to derive conclusions from conditional statements. It helps in proving the validity of arguments by showing that if the conclusion is false, then the premises must also be false.


In modus tollens the second premise a single term is drawn from what part of the first premise?

first or consequent


What does a valid argument contain?

A valid argument contains a logical structure in which the premises logically lead to the conclusion. This means that if the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. Additionally, the argument must follow the rules of logic, such as modus ponens or modus tollens.


What does M O stand for in law enforcement?

modus operandi