.5 chance of getting each question right.
4 questions
.5^4= .0625
We have no way of knowing the probability of any given person flipping any given coin at any given time. But for any two flips of an honest coin, the probability that both are tails is 25% . (1/4, or 3 to 1 against)
It is possible for the captain and the goalkeeper to be the same person. This changes the probability very significantly. There is nothing in the question to indicated that this is or is not the case.
The mathematical probability is 0.
you ether use a graph tree diagram or web diagram to answer the possible outcomes of the question possible outcomes meaning the number of outcomes the person will have in the probability or divide the number of favourable outcomes by the number of possible outcomes favorible outcomes meaning the number of outcomes all together
Yes, but only if there are only two outcomes for an experiment: success and failure. If there are more than two outcomes possible, for example Win, Draw or Lose, the outcomes have to be grouped so that the assertion in the question remains valid. Also, note that in everyday use there is a positive connotation for the word "success". This is not the case in probability theory. If you want the probability of a person being killed by a lightning strike, then success requires thaa person being killed. I somehow don't think the person would consider that a "success".
We have no way of knowing the probability of any given person flipping any given coin at any given time. But for any two flips of an honest coin, the probability that both are tails is 25% . (1/4, or 3 to 1 against)
No.(A person? Joke question, right?)
It is possible for the captain and the goalkeeper to be the same person. This changes the probability very significantly. There is nothing in the question to indicated that this is or is not the case.
The mathematical probability is 0.
The experimental probability is figured out when a person goes through the trouble of actually trying it out. Theoretical probability is when a person comes to a conclusion of what is most likely, based off of the experiment results.
Keep them calm, you don't want them flipping out.
+person who invented probability
you ether use a graph tree diagram or web diagram to answer the possible outcomes of the question possible outcomes meaning the number of outcomes the person will have in the probability or divide the number of favourable outcomes by the number of possible outcomes favorible outcomes meaning the number of outcomes all together
Yes, but only if there are only two outcomes for an experiment: success and failure. If there are more than two outcomes possible, for example Win, Draw or Lose, the outcomes have to be grouped so that the assertion in the question remains valid. Also, note that in everyday use there is a positive connotation for the word "success". This is not the case in probability theory. If you want the probability of a person being killed by a lightning strike, then success requires thaa person being killed. I somehow don't think the person would consider that a "success".
A mathematician or a statistician.
If you are a complete utter twit, who needs to die in hell, and is stupid enough to ask this question, then yes. Or you could get a life and go to Tesco like a normal flipping person.
The question is ambiguous. Does it seek the probability thatsome random person in the world dies in an avalanche, orsomeone who is caught in an avalanche dying rather than surviving, orthe cause of a someone dying is an avalanche rather than something else?