The ancient Romans had no real reasons for such large number but if necessary their numeracy system is quite capable of converting the Hindu-Arabic number of 831,809,202 into Roman numerals by means of brackets and superscripts as follows:-
(DCCCXXXI)M(DCCCVIIII)CCII =>1000*831*1000+1000*809+202 = 831,809,202
Note that in todays modern configuration of Roman numerals they differ in many respects in how the Romans actually wrote them out as for example 19 is now XIX but once it was XVIIII or as IXX
27, in Arabic numerals.
The Roman numeral of XXII is equivalent to the Arabic numeral of 22
The Roman numerals of CCCLXXXIII are equivalent to the Hindu-Arabic numerals of 383
In today's notation of Roman numerals they represent 341 in Hindu-Arabic numerals
on converting the Arabic number into roman numerals we get that : 100 in roman numerals is written as : C C is used for 100 in roman numerals .
27, in Arabic numerals.
The Roman numeral of XXII is equivalent to the Arabic numeral of 22
The Roman numerals of CCCLXXXIII are equivalent to the Hindu-Arabic numerals of 383
In today's notation of Roman numerals they represent 341 in Hindu-Arabic numerals
on converting the Arabic number into roman numerals we get that : 100 in roman numerals is written as : C C is used for 100 in roman numerals .
There is no system called "Arabic numbers". XII can be defined by a set of Arabic NUMERALS, but not by a single character.Improved Answer:-The Roman numerals of XII equals 12 in Hindu-Arabic numerals.
829
It is equivalent to 3307 in Hindu-Arabic numerals
If you are talking about roman numerals, the the numerals in Hindu Arabic is: 246
on converting the Arabic number into roman numerals we get that 300 in roman numerals is written as : CCC as C=100.
In Arabic numerals, it is 616. In Roman numerals, it is DCXVI.
the arabic numbers were invented in the 10th centuary and replaced roman numerals in the 14th centuary