It is 500.00
500
9126 + 6953 ------------- 16079 16079 rounded to the nearest hundred is 16100 - because 79 is closer to 100.
There is no universal "better". Rounding off is a trade-off between reducing the accuracy and simplifying calculations. Also, if there are other numbers in an addition that are rounded to the nearest hundred, there is no point in rounding your number to the nearest ten.
To add 0.889, 0.32, and 0.0033, you simply add the numbers together: 0.889 + 0.32 + 0.0033 = 1.2123. Rounding to the nearest hundred would mean rounding to two decimal places, so the result would be 1.21.
It is 500.00
500
8653 + 8492 = 17145 17145 to nearest 100 is 17100
9126 + 6953 ------------- 16079 16079 rounded to the nearest hundred is 16100 - because 79 is closer to 100.
There is no universal "better". Rounding off is a trade-off between reducing the accuracy and simplifying calculations. Also, if there are other numbers in an addition that are rounded to the nearest hundred, there is no point in rounding your number to the nearest ten.
12 + 0.25 + 4.75 = 17. That would be rounded to 17 to the nearest integer, 20 to the nearest ten, and 0 to the nearest hundred, thousand, (and higher powers of 10).
332 + 168 = 500 which does not need rounding.
5400
To add 0.889, 0.32, and 0.0033, you simply add the numbers together: 0.889 + 0.32 + 0.0033 = 1.2123. Rounding to the nearest hundred would mean rounding to two decimal places, so the result would be 1.21.
Rounding just the solution to the nearest thousand, 123 + 456 is approximately equal to 1000.
157.93 plus 104.52 = 262.45Rounding to the nearest hundred this becomes 300. Rounding to the nearest ten this becomes 260.In this instance rounding to the nearest ten is more reasonable.
rounding this question to the nearest hundred, the answer is 0 rounding this question to the nearest ten, the answer is 40 the most specific i can get this answer is aproximately 37.0O0O0O0O0O0O0O0O0O0