Its area.
It is a closed geometric figure so so contains space within it.
It is its volume which is measured in cubic units
This theorem gives a relation between the total flux through any surface and net charge enclosed within the surface.
If I understand the question correctly, the answer is faces.
No. Pyramids are three-dimensional, and hence cannot be drawn within a single plane.
It is a closed geometric figure so so contains space within it.
contents are within 12 inches of the ground surface
Gauss's law can be used to find the electric field strength within a slab by considering a Gaussian surface that encloses the slab. By applying Gauss's law, which relates the electric flux through a closed surface to the charge enclosed by that surface, one can derive an expression for the electric field strength within the slab.
Yes. Once you take it out, it should start healing within a day or two and be closed within a week or less.
it would be the figure's volume
i am doing a project about that right now! a close catchment is were water comes from an area where humans are prohibited. normally it is a forest or something like that. a closed catchment enables the water quality to be better. hope that helps!
Inwardly; within the enveloping surface, or the boundary of a thing; within the body; beneath the surface. Or On or from the inside.
Closed circulatory system. Blood is enclosed within blood vessels and does not directly come into contact with cells in the tissues.
No, entropy is not always conserved in a closed system. Entropy can increase or decrease in a closed system depending on the processes happening within it.
Burning a candle is considered a closed system because the wax and wick within the candle system are confined, and the energy and matter within the system (such as heat, light, and gases emitted) do not exchange with the surroundings. The energy released from burning the candle is contained within the system, making it a closed system.
As soon as you ask "Is it precisely true ...", we know immediately that it must not be, and we know that our task is to search your version of the statement for the hidden gotchas. I don't think Gauss stated his "Law of Electricity" in terms of 'lines of force'. Seems to me more likely that he stated it in terms of the surface integral over the closed surface. But even if you want to state it in terms of 'lines', then there are a couple of small problems with the way it's stated in the question above: 1). Instead of the "total" number of lines, it would have to be the "net" number of lines, and it would have to say something about the lines crossing the closed surface in the direction normal to it, in case the closed surface isn't a sphere. 2). Gauss talked about just plain charge, without regard for positive or negative as quoted here. And corresponding to that item, he wouldn't have mentioned the "outward direction" either.
A closed fist within a 5 point star.