No, it does not. It the quantity being measured is less than it was in the base period, ten the index will be less than 100.No, it does not. It the quantity being measured is less than it was in the base period, ten the index will be less than 100.No, it does not. It the quantity being measured is less than it was in the base period, ten the index will be less than 100.No, it does not. It the quantity being measured is less than it was in the base period, ten the index will be less than 100.
Here's a start umbers=[True]*5001 index=2 primes=[] while index<5000: multiplier=2 while index*multiplier <= 5000: Numbers[index*multiplier]=False multiplier+=1 index+=1 while Numbers[index]==False and index < 5000: index+=1 for x in range(0,5000): if Numbers[x]==True: primes.append(x) x+=1 print primes
Base
That is true.
The answer depends on what information you have. Given only one number, all that can be said is that the base is larger than the largest digit appearing in the number.Equations will not help if there are no "carries". For example,For example, 10 + 12 = 22 is true in any base greater than or equal to 3.[In base 3, it is 3+5=8, in base 4, it is 4+6=10, in base 500 it is 500+502=1002, in base e (= 2.7183...) it is 2.7183+4.7183 =7.4366 (approx).]
The value of the variable in the base period forms the basis of comparison of the variable in other periods.
A base period for an index number serves as the reference point for comparison with other periods. It is typically assigned a value of 100 for simplicity in calculations. The base period allows for tracking changes in the index over time relative to a fixed point.
No, it does not. It the quantity being measured is less than it was in the base period, ten the index will be less than 100.No, it does not. It the quantity being measured is less than it was in the base period, ten the index will be less than 100.No, it does not. It the quantity being measured is less than it was in the base period, ten the index will be less than 100.No, it does not. It the quantity being measured is less than it was in the base period, ten the index will be less than 100.
false
true
Here's a start umbers=[True]*5001 index=2 primes=[] while index<5000: multiplier=2 while index*multiplier <= 5000: Numbers[index*multiplier]=False multiplier+=1 index+=1 while Numbers[index]==False and index < 5000: index+=1 for x in range(0,5000): if Numbers[x]==True: primes.append(x) x+=1 print primes
True
It is triple the number of edges on one base.
An index is a systematic way of referencing an ordered a set of objects.
It is three times the number of sides on a base of the prism.
No, an index fossil does not have to have been rare to be useful. The key characteristic of an index fossil is that it is easily recognizable, widespread geographically, and existed for a relatively short period of time. This allows geologists to use it to help date the rock layers in which it is found.
It's 10000 .Actually, that's true regardless of whatever base it's written in.