None. A kilogram is a measure of mass while a dollar is a measure of monetary value. The two measure different things and, according to basic principles of dimensional analysis, conversion from one to the other is not valid.
There can be no equivalence. A pound is a measure of mass or of monetary value whereas feet or inches are measures of length in 1-dimensional space. The two measure different things and, according to basic principles of dimensional analysis, any attempt at conversion from one to the other is fundamentally flawed.
Yes. Conversion factors will generally be dimensionless constants.
None, since there can be no conversion. A centimetre is a measure of length in 1-dimensional space while a pound is a measure of mass or monetary value. The two measure different things and, according to basic principles of dimensional analysis, any attempt at conversion from one to the other is fundamentally flawed.
You cannot. Pound is a measure of mass or of a currency value. A square is (presumably) some measure of area (in unspecified units). The two measure different things and, according to basic principles of dimensional analysis, conversion from one to the other is not valid without some addition information.
None, since there can be no conversion. A centimetre is a measure of length in 1-dimensional space while a pound is a measure of mass or monetary value. The two measure different things and, according to basic principles of dimensional analysis, any attempt at conversion from one to the other is fundamentally flawed.
There can be no conversion. A linear metre is a measure of length in 1-dimensional space while a square metre is a measure of area in 2-dimensional space. The two measure different things and, according to basic principles of dimensional analysis, any attempt at conversion from one to the other is fundamentally flawed.
Factor affecting statment value analysis
A pound is a measure of mass (or monetary value). A ppm is a measure of concentration. The two measure different things and, according to basic principles of dimensional analysis, conversion from one to the other is not valid.
None. A kilogram is a measure of mass while a dollar is a measure of monetary value. The two measure different things and, according to basic principles of dimensional analysis, conversion from one to the other is not valid.
You would use dimensional analysis. Starting with an area in meters squared, you would then multiply by the following conversion factor: (3.28)2 ft2 (1)2 m2 Simplifying the conversion factor, you would multiple the square meters value by 10.78 to get square feet.
In order to use dimensional analysis, you need to multiply the conversion factor between both units you are trying to convert to by your original value. If you want to convert 24.00m into feet, you multiply this value my the conversion factor. In this case, 1m=3.281ft, or (3.281/1m)=1 as they are equivalent. You also want to have your original unit on the bottom of the ratio so they cancel out. 24.00m x (3.281ft/1m) = 78.744ft The meters cancel as there is one in the nominator of the first number and one in the denominator of the second ratio. If you want to go from feet to meters, the same technique is applied, but the values of the ratio are switched 34ft x (1m/3.281ft) = 10.36m
The conversion factor from WHAT to WHAT! Daily value to value per second? per year? Daily value of compounds of sodium? If so, which ones?
The effect of multiplying a given measurement by one or more conversion factors the value may be changed.
None: there is no equivalence. A square metre is a measure of area distance in 2-dimensional space while a pound is a measure of mass or of currency value. The two measure different things and, according to basic principles of dimensional analysis, conversion from one to the other is not valid without some addition information.
There can be no equivalence. A pound is a measure of mass or of monetary value whereas feet or inches are measures of length in 1-dimensional space. The two measure different things and, according to basic principles of dimensional analysis, any attempt at conversion from one to the other is fundamentally flawed.
Yes. Conversion factors will generally be dimensionless constants.