5 is V and 1967 is MCMLXVII but there is no way to say may in roman numerals.
MCMXCIX EDIT: A shorter way to write it is MIM
This is tricky because 400 is shown as 500 minus 100. And 50 is going to be L. CDLIV is the way to write it in Roman Numerals.
The correct way to write 1209 in Roman Numerals is MCCIX.
The roman numerals don't have a way to write 0, negative numbers, or fractions.
5 is V and 1967 is MCMLXVII but there is no way to say may in roman numerals.
The proper way to write super bowl 44 using Roman Numerals is Super Bowl XVIV.
CDLXVIII is the proper way to write the number 468 in Roman numerals. Roman culture is fascinating and wonderful to research, and roman numerals are pretty fantastic too!
MCMXCIX EDIT: A shorter way to write it is MIM
This is tricky because 400 is shown as 500 minus 100. And 50 is going to be L. CDLIV is the way to write it in Roman Numerals.
The correct way to write 1209 in Roman Numerals is MCCIX.
The roman numerals don't have a way to write 0, negative numbers, or fractions.
In the same order as asked, "MCMLXXVII/I/I" The "/" is just to separate, and is not to deal with the roman numerals in any way.
One way to write 312 is by spelling it: Three hundred and twelveAnother way would be to write it in roman numerals: CCCXII
The way we write out Roman numerals in the modern way today differs from the old way of writing out Roman numerals. For example today we would write out the equivalent of 49 and 99 as XLIX and XCIX respectively but the Romans themselves in the past probably wrote them out simply as IL and IC
Roman numerals do not include decimals although the Romans did use fractions to a limited extent.
Under today's rules we write out the equivalent of 29 into Roman numerals as XXIX But under the Roman rules 29 was XXVIIII *By roman rules I assume you mean Roman Numerals. Romans wrote out 29 as XXIX, the same way they work today.