99 is a larger number in mathematical size than 27.
Suppose the smaller number is x. Then the larger number is 4x. Their difference is 4x - x = 3x So, 3x = 27 which gives x = 9 and then 4x = 4-9 = 36 So the numbers are 9 and 36. (Actually, the pair -9 and -36 are also a solution.)
81 Each number is 3 x the previous number. So, 3 x 27 = 81.
No.
24 and 25 are relatively prime because they have no common factor greater than 1. Each of the other number pairs in the question has a common factor greater than 1.
99 is a larger number in mathematical size than 27.
Suppose the smaller number is x. Then the larger number is 4x. Their difference is 4x - x = 3x So, 3x = 27 which gives x = 9 and then 4x = 4-9 = 36 So the numbers are 9 and 36. (Actually, the pair -9 and -36 are also a solution.)
24 - 27 - 30 - 33 - 36 - 39 - 42 etc. * 27 is 3 larger than 24 * 30 is 3 larger than 27 * ... and so on
243 each number is 3 times larger than previous 1 x 3 = 3 3 x 3 = 9 9 x 3 = 27 27 x 3 = 81 81 x 3 = 243
Neither 494733 nor 27 is a prime number because they each are divisible by 3.
I suggest factoring each pair of numbers, and checking whether they have, or don't have, common factors. A pair of numbers is said to be "relatively prime" if they have no common factors (their greatest common factor is 1). For larger numbers, Euclid's algorithm could be used, but for such small numbers, factoring is probably faster.
Poosible meanings/definitions 1. 27 is number (natural number, whole number, integer, odd number, nonprime number). 2. 27 can be either a cardinal number or an ordinal number (refer to the dictionary for precise definitions for each type of number). 3. 27 is the sum of 27 ones or 2*2*5+7
10 and 21
81 Each number is 3 x the previous number. So, 3 x 27 = 81.
81. Each number is the previous number times three. 3 x 27 = 81.
27... I have a larger-than-life SpongeBob plush toy and I counted all the holes.
No.