In today's terms 144 in Roman numerals is: CXLIV
12 x 12 = 144 = CXLIV = 100 + 40 + 4
144 is CXLIV
144
In today's terms 144 converted into Roman numerals is CXLIV though the Romans themselves would have probably wrote it out as CXXXXIIII.
In today's terms 144 in Roman numerals is: CXLIV
Under the modern rules now governing the Roman numeral system CXLIV is now equivalent to 144 but the ancient Romans would have notated the equivalent of 144 in Roman numerals quite differently.
12 x 12 = 144 = CXLIV = 100 + 40 + 4
144 is CXLIV
144
In today's terms 144 converted into Roman numerals is CXLIV though the Romans themselves would have probably wrote it out as CXXXXIIII.
In todays modern notation of Roman numerals: 144 = CXLIV But the ancient Romans would have notated it quite differently
CXLIVIn today's modern notation of Roman numerals it is now considered to be CXLIV but the ancient Romans would have notated the equivalent of 144 quite differently.
144. C=100+(L=50-X=10 (because it comes before, 10 before 50))+(V=5-I=1 (Because it comes before, 1 before 5) 100+50-10+5-1=144 That's how it works.
it is a base ten number system. It works out well since we have 10 fingers. Other choices commonly used are binary, or base 2 systems. The early Egyptian number system used different symbols for 1, 10, 100, and so on, with each symbol repeated the required number of times. Later, the Babylonians had symbols for 1 and 10 repeated similarly, but for larger numbers they used a positional notation with base 60, so that groups of symbols were positioned to indicate the number of different powers of 60. The Greek number system used letters to stand for numbers. For example, α, β, γ, and δ represented 1, 2, 3, and 4 and ι, κ, λ, and μ represented 10, 20, 30, and 40. The Roman number system is still known today and used for some special purpose. Roughly speaking, each Roman numeral is repeated as often as necessary to give the required total, with the larger numerals appearing before the smaller, except that if a smaller precedes a larger its value is subtracted. For example, IX, XXVI and CXLIV represent 9, 26 and 144. The Hindu-Arabic number system, in which numbers are generally written today, uses the Arabic numerals and a positional notation with base 10. It originated in India, where records of its use go back to the sixth century. It was introduced to Europe in the twelfth century, promoted by Fibonnacci and others.
Well, in ancient times you might have seen it that way more often (per Wikipedia). So it's not really wrong per se. In fact, some fancy clocks use IIII instead of IV for aesthetic reasons. But if you're a student, don't expect your teacher to mark cxxxxiiii correct. The current standard which has been around for a few hundred years is that you don't use more than 3 of the same symbol. Because it's shorter, I believe.
(positive number) x (positive number) = positive number (positive number)/(positive number) = positive number (positive number) x ( negative number) = negative number (positive number)/( negative number) = negative number (negative number) x (negative number) = positive number (negative number)/(negative number) = positive number