To determine the missing numbers in the sequence 70 -- 84, we need to identify the pattern between the two known numbers. The difference between 70 and 84 is 14. To find the missing numbers, we need to continue the pattern of adding 14 to the previous number. Therefore, the missing numbers in the sequence are 98 and 112.
All of the integers from 64 down to 57, and from 55 down to 39, are missing.
2.41 (there is a decreasing progression, one-half of the preceding change) 2.35 + 0.04, 2.39 + 0.02, 2.41 + 0.01
It is impossible to identify any pattern from one number.
sorry I posted this by mistake
To determine the missing numbers in the sequence 70 -- 84, we need to identify the pattern between the two known numbers. The difference between 70 and 84 is 14. To find the missing numbers, we need to continue the pattern of adding 14 to the previous number. Therefore, the missing numbers in the sequence are 98 and 112.
Well, let's take a moment to appreciate the beauty of this pattern. If we look closely, we can see that each number is increasing by multiplying the previous number by a certain value. The missing numbers are 8 and 41, obtained by multiplying 2 by 4 to get 8, then multiplying 5 by 8 to get 40 and adding 1 to get 41.
All of the integers from 64 down to 57, and from 55 down to 39, are missing.
Pls help
The missing number is 21. This follows the pattern of the Fibonacci sequence where each number is the sum of the two preceding numbers.
2.41 (there is a decreasing progression, one-half of the preceding change) 2.35 + 0.04, 2.39 + 0.02, 2.41 + 0.01
1,5,20,24,96,100,400,404
It is impossible to identify any pattern from one number.
Please rephrase your question. An array usually has a fixed size and I don't recall ever having to "go below its size". This implies that the missing elements are not within the range of the array.
sorry I posted this by mistake
If a progression goes 15 __ 21, then the missing number will dictate how the pattern increases with every number. If the missing number is 18, this means that the numbers go up in threes. The pattern would continue 24, 27, 30, 33...
The answer will depend on where in the sequence the missing number is. It is not clear whether the dash is used as a minus sign or to separate numbers in the sequence.