answersLogoWhite

0

Oh, dude, like, numbers that can go into 9 are 1, 3, and 9. And for 48, you've got 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, and 48. So, yeah, those are the lucky numbers that can cozy up inside 9 and 48.

User Avatar

DudeBot

8mo ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What numbers (1-9) can go into 27 and 48?

1 and 3.


Numbers that go into 48?

1,2,3,4,6,8,12,16,24,48


What two numbers have the sum of 57 and a product of 432?

the numbers are 48 and 9 !!


What two numbers go in to 48?

The two whole numbers that go into 48 (its factors) are 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 24, and 48.


How many times does 9 go into 48?

48/9 = 5.33...


What is the sum of all odd numbers between 9 and 15?

To find the sum of all odd numbers between 9 and 15, we first identify the odd numbers between these two values, which are 9, 11, 13, and 15. Next, we add these numbers together: 9 + 11 + 13 + 15 = 48. Therefore, the sum of all odd numbers between 9 and 15 is 48.


How many times can 13 go into 48?

To determine how many times 13 can go into 48, we divide 48 by 13. The quotient is 3 with a remainder of 9. Therefore, 13 can go into 48 three times with a remainder of 9.


Which two numbers below have a least common multiple of 48?

In the absence of the numbers below, let's go with 24 and 48.


Is 24 a factor of 48?

A factor = a number which can be divided into the given number with no remainder so yes 48/24 = 2


Does 9 go into 48 evenly?

no


What are the missing numbers in the pattern below 12 21 30 39?

The pattern involves adding 9 to each consecutive number. Starting from 12, the sequence progresses as follows: 12 + 9 = 21, 21 + 9 = 30, and 30 + 9 = 39. Therefore, the next two numbers in the pattern would be 39 + 9 = 48 and 48 + 9 = 57. Thus, the missing numbers are 48 and 57.


Does 9 go into 48?

Oh, dude, let me break it down for you. So, 9 does go into 48 because 48 divided by 9 equals 5 with a remainder of 3. So, technically, yes, 9 does go into 48, but like, who's really keeping track of remainders anyway?