To effectively evaluate an article, consider asking, "What is the main argument or thesis, and how well does the author support it with evidence?" This question encourages a critical assessment of the clarity and strength of the author's claims, as well as the quality and relevance of the supporting data. Additionally, examining the credibility of the sources and the author's qualifications can provide further insights into the article's reliability and bias.
evaluate: 6-2[(3+4)-8]
Not sure if this will help but - see the Article from Wikipedia in the attached link. There are various 'conversion tables' in there which might solve your question.
What is the question?
I’d be happy to help! Please provide me with the specific question or topic you’re looking for information on, and I’ll do my best to assist you.
To determine which expressions are equivalent, you need to analyze their structure and simplify them if necessary. Equivalent expressions yield the same value for all variable inputs, so you can also substitute specific values to test for equality. If you provide the specific expressions in question, I can help you evaluate their equivalence.
Do I agree with the points made in the article? (APEX)
Do I agree with the points made in the article? (APEX)
that's not a question
what are the goals of the text, and what elements help achieve those goals? (apex)
Who is the article talking about?
This article should help you answer that question: http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/331326/signs_of_compulsive_lying.html
If you explain what you mean by "Article 8" I'll do my best to help.
Maybe the article link below will help answer your question.
Maybe the article link below will help answer part of your question.
Maybe the article links will help to answer your question. Hope this helps.
The article link might help you to answer some of that question. Hope this helps.
Maybe the article link below will help answer your question.