0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What happens When a random sampling frame has a systematic pattern in the listing of sampling units rather than a random pattern?
You get a non-random sample and any analysis based on the assumption of randomly distributed variables is no longer valid. In particular, your estimates of any variables are likely to be biased and your error estimates (standard errors or sample variances) will be incorrect. Any inferences based on statistical tests will be less reliable and may be wrong.
Define sampling design?
Sampling is a method of selecting experimental units from a population so that we can make decision about the population. Sampling design is a design, or a working plan, that specifies the population frame,sample size, sample selection, and estimation method in detail. Objective of the sampling design is to know the characteristic of the population.
How can you choose a random sample of teachers?
The first step is to establish a sampling frame. This is a list of all teachers in the domain that you are interested in. Next you allocate a different number to each teacher. Then you use a random number generator to generate random numbers. You select each teacher whose number is generated. If the teacher has already been selected for inclusion in the sample, you ignore the duplicate and continue until you have a sample of the required size.
How big is a 12 inch digital photo frame?
I don't know just taking a random guess here lets say.......12 inches
What is the definition of a systematic type of sampling in biology?
As the wikipedia article on this subject suggests, systematic sampling is most readily applied when potential sample elements are linearly ordered either in time or space. For example, one could choose to include every fifth customer arriving at a store in one's sample, which would be an instance where sample elements are ordered in time. The difficulty with many research situations in biology is obviously that sample elements are not linearly ordered. A herd of buffalo in a grassy field, for example, or a collection of microorganisms on a microscope slide. Remedies depend on circumstances. Suppose you want to apply systematic sampling in a small forest where you want to estimate the fraction of trees infested with a certain species of insect. You decide on, say, a one in five sample and that you will include 500 trees in your sampling frame in order to get a sample size of 100. To begin you walk enough parallel transects through the forest, marking sufficiently large trees as you go, to get your 500-tree sampling frame. Then you take a second trip through along transects to identify infested trees.
What sampling method does not require a frame?
Systematic sampling doesn't require a frame. This method takes in every data from a sample, rather than restricting it by any particular means.
How do you explain the meaning and purpose of a sampling frame in random sampling?
The term "sampling frame" may have no meaning at all in "random" sampling, since the "frame" by nature sets the parameters of the sampling, thus rendering the sampling somewhat "non-random". Having said that, you might want to study the quality of corn in your area and, depending on which aspects or determining factors you are studying, you might set your sampling frame as "all the farmers in Waterloo region" or "all the farmers in a particular area growing Gold Harvest F1 Hybrid". These two examples will obviously give you different results as they are intended to study different aspects of corn.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of mixed sampling?
avantages and disadvantages of mixed sampling are explained by example given below : if we want to take sample of trees in the forest of India for this we will selected the forests by the simple random sampling and after this we will selected the trees by the systematic sampling we can not used simple random sampling here due to not availability of frame of trees.So this is adavantages of mixed sampling. Now if we want to check the relability of whole procedure then we will not check it .So this is disadavantages of mixed sampling.
What is Sampling frame?
A sampling frame is defined as the complete list or a map that contains all the "n" sampling units in a population
What is bias sample?
Sampling bias occurs when the sampling frame does not reflect the characteristics of the population which is being tested. Biased samples can result from problems with either the sampling technique or the data-collection method. Essentially, the group does not reflect the population which is supposed to be represented in the given survey or test. For example: If the question being asked in a survey was "do American's prefer Coca-Cola or Pepsi?" and all people asked were under 18 and from California, there would be a sampling bias as the sampling frame would not accurately represent "American's".
What is the difference between sampling frame and sampling uinit?
Samplig frame is the source material from which the sample is drawn. If you have a 'list' of names of all inviduals from which you could draw a sample, the list is a sampling frame. A samplig unit is the sample being chosen.
How can you perform a sample selected in such a way that each member of the population has an equal probability of being included?
The short answer is "random sample," but that, unfortunately, is neither specific nor complete. It is not specific because there are forms of random sampling where selection probabilities are not constant. It is not complete because there are many different ways to conduct random sampling with equal selection probabilities. "Simple random sampling" occurs when you can perform a process that, for all practical purposes, behaves like writing down the identifier of each population member on a piece of paper, putting all the pieces into a box, mixing them thoroughly, and pulling out a few of them one by one (without replacing them in the box). Nowadays we use a computer to do this job, because it's faster and more reliable (it is notoriously difficult to mix pieces of paper perfectly randomly). The computer needs a complete list of all the population members: this is called a <i>sampling frame</i>. Here is an example of random sampling that is not simple but still selects every population member with equal probability. Suppose you want to sample half the students in a classroom of 30. Ask them to line up. Flip a fair coin: if it's heads, pick the first, third, ..., 29th in line. If tails, pick the second, fourth, ..., 30th. Any individual student has a 50% chance of being part of the sample, so each student has an equal probability of being included. However, if you lined up the students boy-girl-boy-girl, etc., the samples themselves wouldn't look very random: they will either be mostly boys or mostly girls. It's still random though, because it's determined by the flip of a coin. The example highlights a subtle but important property of a random sample: in many cases, you want the selection of population members to be <b>independent</b>. This means the probability of selecting one member is not affected by which other members are selected. In simple random sampling, independence holds; in the second example (a form of <i>gridded sampling</i>), there is complete dependence: no student can be chosen along with either of their neighbors in line, for instance. Simple random sampling is ideal for many purposes but often cannot be carried out in practice because it is not feasible (you might not be able to construct a sampling frame) or costs too much. Often, more complicated procedures, such as <i>hierarchical sampling</i>, are carried out to overcome these limitations. (An example of hierarchical sampling is when an epidemiologist selects a city at random, then selects households at random within the city, then selects children at random within each household to study. Doing it this way can require much less travel than selecting children at random from all over the state.) These procedures might or might not select population members with equal probability. Usually the selection is not independent, either. When the probabilities are unequal, they can be figured out and used as <i>weights</i> in statistical analysis of the data. Results can also be adjusted for lack of independence. A good, readable, non-technical introduction to sampling and simple random samples is the textbook <i>Statistics</i> by Freedman, Pisani, and Purves. Any edition is fine. Steven Thompson's book <i>Sampling</i> discusses dozens of different sampling procedures and explains the theory behind each one.
What happens When a random sampling frame has a systematic pattern in the listing of sampling units rather than a random pattern?
You get a non-random sample and any analysis based on the assumption of randomly distributed variables is no longer valid. In particular, your estimates of any variables are likely to be biased and your error estimates (standard errors or sample variances) will be incorrect. Any inferences based on statistical tests will be less reliable and may be wrong.
Define sampling design?
Sampling is a method of selecting experimental units from a population so that we can make decision about the population. Sampling design is a design, or a working plan, that specifies the population frame,sample size, sample selection, and estimation method in detail. Objective of the sampling design is to know the characteristic of the population.
How can you choose a random sample of teachers?
The first step is to establish a sampling frame. This is a list of all teachers in the domain that you are interested in. Next you allocate a different number to each teacher. Then you use a random number generator to generate random numbers. You select each teacher whose number is generated. If the teacher has already been selected for inclusion in the sample, you ignore the duplicate and continue until you have a sample of the required size.
What problems or limitations could prevent a truly random sampling and how can they be prevented?
Cost: A random sample of schools across a country would require travel all over the country. This is expensive in time and money. The solution is to use cluster sampling.Non-compliance: Subject sharing a common characteristic cannot or will not provide the information sought. Not much that can be done unless you can invoke statutory powers. However, even that may not work. A classic example of this was approx 1 million people who were "missed out" in the 1991 UK population census because they did not wish to be on the tax register, despite the fact that not returning the census form is a crime carrying a heavy fine (GBP 1,000).Unknown (or incomplete) sampling frame: You cannot assign a sampling probability if the total number in the population is not known. Use capture-recapture first to estimate population size.
Advantages of snowball sampling?
Snowball sampling allows for the recruitment of hard-to-reach populations, such as marginalized or hidden communities. It is particularly useful for studying groups where there is no defined sampling frame. Additionally, it can help build trust and rapport with participants as referrals come from within the community.
