No idea what you're on about. If you are asking in what order do the sets of numbers apear in terms of proving there existence, I believe they are in the following order:
N->Z->Q->R->C
Where: N is the set of natural numbers, i.e. whole numbers ranging from 1 to infinity.
Z is the set or whole numbers including zero ranging from -infinity to +infinity
Q is the set of rational numbers, i.e. the set of numbers that can be expressed in the form a/b where a and b are in Z with b not equal to 0.
R is the set or real numbers, the collection of every rational and non rational number.
C is the set of complex numbers, i.e. all numbers that can be expressed as a+biwhere a and b are in R and i is the squareroot of -1.
Rational numbers are numbers that can be expressed as a ratio of two integers, a/b, where b is not zero.
1, 2 are rational and square root of 2 and pi are irrational.
-54 is included in negative integer or rational nos.
Being rational or irrational is not about "predicting the next digit"; the definition of a rational number is that you can write it as a fraction, with integer numerator and denominator.Being rational or irrational is not about "predicting the next digit"; the definition of a rational number is that you can write it as a fraction, with integer numerator and denominator.Being rational or irrational is not about "predicting the next digit"; the definition of a rational number is that you can write it as a fraction, with integer numerator and denominator.Being rational or irrational is not about "predicting the next digit"; the definition of a rational number is that you can write it as a fraction, with integer numerator and denominator.
Next to any rational number is an irrational number, but next to an irrational number can be either a rational number or an irrational number, but it is infinitely more likely to be an irrational number (as between any two rational numbers are an infinity of irrational numbers).
Some of them are, some of them aren't
Rational numbers are numbers that can be expressed as a ratio of two integers, a/b, where b is not zero.
1, 2 are rational and square root of 2 and pi are irrational.
Irrational numbers can not be expressed as fractions whereas rational numbers can be expressed as fractions.
-54 is included in negative integer or rational nos.
An irrational number is a real number that is not rational. A rational number is one that can be expressed as a ratio of two integers. An irrational number cannot be expressed in this way.
Being rational or irrational is not about "predicting the next digit"; the definition of a rational number is that you can write it as a fraction, with integer numerator and denominator.Being rational or irrational is not about "predicting the next digit"; the definition of a rational number is that you can write it as a fraction, with integer numerator and denominator.Being rational or irrational is not about "predicting the next digit"; the definition of a rational number is that you can write it as a fraction, with integer numerator and denominator.Being rational or irrational is not about "predicting the next digit"; the definition of a rational number is that you can write it as a fraction, with integer numerator and denominator.
Next to any rational number is an irrational number, but next to an irrational number can be either a rational number or an irrational number, but it is infinitely more likely to be an irrational number (as between any two rational numbers are an infinity of irrational numbers).
"We people is we voice." (It's not grammatical in Latin; why should it be grammatical in English?)"Our people is our voice." (Nos means our; we (are) is translated as sumus.)
1, 3, 9 and 27
You could say "Nos vemos el mes que viene." or "Nos vemos el proximo mes".
Yes. Its rational because you know what number is going to come next. If the numbers were in a random order it would be irrational.