0
What else can I help you with?
What strategy would a historian most likely to use to determine whether a source is valid?
A historian would likely assess the validity of a source by examining its authorship, context, and purpose, considering who created it, when, and why. They would also evaluate the source’s credibility by cross-referencing it with other reliable sources and checking for biases or inconsistencies. Additionally, analyzing the intended audience and the medium of the source can provide insights into its reliability and relevance.
What is hypothesis in basic statistic?
A statistician may have some idea about some statistics in a data set, and there is a need to test whether or not that hypothesis is likely to be true. Data are collected and a test statistic is calculated. The value of this test statistic is used to determine the probability that the hypothesis is true.
What are three ways that you could begin to determine whether or not a bone found in your backyard is a fossil?
I think that one way is to check the colour (if its grey-stone coloured-then its more likely to be a fossil), another way may be to see if it is buried in hard rock or not although I am not sure about this last method.
What does the probability of a independent event that is likely to happen?
It is a real number between 0.5 and 1. Whether or not it is independent makes no difference to this answer.
How do you determend probibility?
You can either determine the probability through fractions. ( i.e: a coin has only two sides, if flipped it will be either heads or tails; the outcome will be 1/2 to happen: so equal chance of either. ) However, you can also determine it by how likely something is to happen, e.g: if it is winter it is likely it will rain, yet in summer it is unlikely to rain.
Which strategy would a historian most likely use to determine whether a source is valid?
checking its conclusions against other sources
What strategy would a historian most likely to use to determine whether a source is valid?
A historian would likely assess the validity of a source by examining its authorship, context, and purpose, considering who created it, when, and why. They would also evaluate the source’s credibility by cross-referencing it with other reliable sources and checking for biases or inconsistencies. Additionally, analyzing the intended audience and the medium of the source can provide insights into its reliability and relevance.
What historian is interested to learn whether or not a new biography about a Roman Emperor is likely to be biased?
?
A reader trying to determine whether the historian's interpretation is valid would most likely?
A historian writes an essay on the rise of communism in China during the 20th century. She claims that communism would never have taken hold in the country if the Soviet Union has not supplied the Chiese commuunists with money and military equipment.
Which action would a historian most likely take in order to determine whether the passage draws a valid conclusion?
Determine how many battles during WW2 took place near small farming towns. :)
Which of these would be most likely to determine whether or not the deposit would be mined?
whether the cost of mining will be less than the value of the mineral
Who would be most likely to analyze a tablet with cuneiform to determine what goods were traded by the merchants of Ur?
A historian would be most likely to analyze a tablet with cuneiform to determine what goods were traded by the merchants of Ur.
Which historical thinking skill is the historian using?
The historian is likely using the skill of sourcing, which involves examining the origin of information to determine its credibility and relevance to the historical narrative. By identifying the sources of historical information, historians can better evaluate the context and perspective from which the information is presented.
What does corroborating sources allow political scientist to do?
determine whether an assertion made by one source is likely to be true.
How can you determine whether a spicule is calcareous or siliceous?
You can determine whether a spicule is calcareous or siliceous by performing a simple reactivity test: immerse the spicule in dilute hydrochloric acid (HCl). If it fizzes and dissolves, the spicule is likely calcareous (made of calcium carbonate). If there is no reaction, the spicule is likely siliceous (made of silica).
What factors determine whether an egg will float in water?
The factors that determine whether an egg will float in water are its density and freshness. If an egg is less dense than the water, it will float. Fresh eggs have a higher density and are more likely to sink, while older eggs have a lower density and are more likely to float.
What are two ways to determine whether results are close enough to be considered the same?
By exploring likely possibilities and making a scatter plot
