The term that best describes a proof in which you assume the opposite of what you intend to prove is "proof by contradiction." In this method, you start by assuming that the statement you want to prove is false. Then, by logically deriving a contradiction from that assumption, you conclude that the original statement must be true. This technique is commonly used in various fields of mathematics and logic.
The term that best describes a proof in which you assume the opposite of what you want to prove is 'indirect proof'.
proof by contradiction
True. (apex)
It is true.
This type of proof is known as proof by contradiction. In this approach, you start by assuming that the opposite of your desired conclusion is true. You then demonstrate that this assumption leads to a logical inconsistency or contradiction, thereby reinforcing that the original statement must be true. This method is effective for establishing the validity of propositions where direct proof may be challenging.
The term that best describes a proof in which you assume the opposite of what you want to prove is 'indirect proof'.
The term that best describes a proof in which you assume the opposite of what you want to prove is 'indirect proof'.
proof by contradiction
Proof by contradiction (APEX)
Contradiction or indirect proof.
Proof in which one assumes the opposite of what you have to prove is indirect proof. In indirect proof a person can draw a conclusion from assuming the opposite is true and then find a conclusion.
Answer this question… Which term best describes a proof in which you assume the opposite of what you want to prove?
It is a phrase, not a term. The phrase is reductio ad absurdum.
It is a phrase, not a term. The phrase is reductio ad absurdum.
Proof by contradiction (APEX)
false
True. (apex)