0.6 is the surface area to volume ratio.
Surface area to volume ratio in nanoparticles have a significant effect on the nanoparticles properties. Firstly, nanoparticles have a relative larger surface area when compared to the same volume of the material. For example, let us consider a sphere of radius r: The surface area of the sphere will be 4πr2 The volume of the sphere = 4/3(πr3) Therefore the surface area to the volume ratio will be 4πr2/{4/3(πr3)} = 3/r It means that the surface area to volume ration increases with the decrease in radius of the sphere and vice versa.
Well, first of all, that's no sphere.-- A sphere with surface area = 300 has volume = 488.6.-- A sphere needs surface area of 304.6 in order to have volume = 500.But this is just a ratio exercise, not a geometry problem, so we'll just use the numbersgiven in the question. It's just some sort of wacky humongous paramecium:Surface area = 300Volume = 500Ratio of (surface area)/(volume) = 300/500 = 0.6 .
3 to 7
This is pretty easy, just divide 432 by 864 and you get a 1:2 ratio.
0.6 m-1 is the ratio of surface area to volume for a sphere.
A sphere has the lowest surface area to volume ratio of all geometric shapes. This is because the sphere is able to enclose the largest volume with the smallest surface area due to its symmetrical shape.
0.6 is the surface area to volume ratio.
No. The surface to volume ratio of a sphere is always smaller than that of a cube. This is because the sphere has the smallest surface area compared to its volume, while the cube has the largest surface area compared to its volume.
If they have the same radius then it is: 3 to 2
-- The ratio of 588 to 1,372 is 0.4286 (rounded) -- A sphere with surface area of 588 has volume closer to 1,340.7 . (rounded)
1) Calculate the area 2) Calculate the volume 3) Divide the area by the volume to get the ratio
Surface area to volume ratio in nanoparticles have a significant effect on the nanoparticles properties. Firstly, nanoparticles have a relative larger surface area when compared to the same volume of the material. For example, let us consider a sphere of radius r: The surface area of the sphere will be 4πr2 The volume of the sphere = 4/3(πr3) Therefore the surface area to the volume ratio will be 4πr2/{4/3(πr3)} = 3/r It means that the surface area to volume ration increases with the decrease in radius of the sphere and vice versa.
A sphere has the lowest surface area to volume ratio compared to other shapes because it has the smallest surface area for a given volume. This is due to its symmetrical shape, which minimizes the surface area while maximizing the volume. The sphere's surface area is spread out evenly in all directions, making it more compact and efficient.
No, a basketball does not have a high surface-to-volume ratio because the volume of a sphere increases more rapidly than its surface area as its size increases.
Well, first of all, that's no sphere.-- A sphere with surface area = 300 has volume = 488.6.-- A sphere needs surface area of 304.6 in order to have volume = 500.But this is just a ratio exercise, not a geometry problem, so we'll just use the numbersgiven in the question. It's just some sort of wacky humongous paramecium:Surface area = 300Volume = 500Ratio of (surface area)/(volume) = 300/500 = 0.6 .
The ratio of surface area to volume for a sphere is constant and equal to 3/r, where r is the radius. Given the measurements, you can calculate the radius of the sphere using the formula for volume of a sphere (V = 4/3 * Ο * r^3) and then find the ratio as 3/r.