The process of using facts, rules, definitions, or laws to make conjectures from given situations is known as logical reasoning or deductive reasoning. This approach involves drawing conclusions based on established principles and evidence, allowing one to infer new insights or predictions. In mathematics, for instance, this method is utilized to derive theorems and solve problems by applying known axioms and previously proven statements. Similarly, in scientific inquiry, it helps formulate hypotheses based on empirical data and established theories.
Conjectures are educated guesses or propositions based on observed patterns, serving as a starting point for deeper exploration. Counterexamples challenge these conjectures, helping to refine or discard them by demonstrating situations where the conjecture does not hold true. This iterative process of proposing conjectures and testing them with counterexamples aids in identifying true patterns and establishing more robust mathematical principles. Ultimately, it fosters critical thinking and enhances our understanding of the underlying structures within a given domain.
Statements that require proof are typically those that assert a mathematical or logical truth that is not immediately obvious or self-evident. This includes conjectures, theorems, and propositions that need to be validated through deductive reasoning or empirical evidence. Additionally, any claims that involve complex relationships or properties in a given domain often necessitate rigorous proof to establish their validity. In essence, any assertion that goes beyond basic definitions or established facts generally requires a proof.
some real world problems have more than one answer (output) given one input, these situations can be described by functions
False
You use the information you're given, along with the facts and formulas you know about the geometry of a circle.
That is called deductive reasoning. Deductive reasoning uses established principles or premises to reach a logical conclusion. It involves applying logical rules to derive specific conclusions from general principles.
Conjectures are educated guesses or propositions based on observed patterns, serving as a starting point for deeper exploration. Counterexamples challenge these conjectures, helping to refine or discard them by demonstrating situations where the conjecture does not hold true. This iterative process of proposing conjectures and testing them with counterexamples aids in identifying true patterns and establishing more robust mathematical principles. Ultimately, it fosters critical thinking and enhances our understanding of the underlying structures within a given domain.
Statements that require proof are typically those that assert a mathematical or logical truth that is not immediately obvious or self-evident. This includes conjectures, theorems, and propositions that need to be validated through deductive reasoning or empirical evidence. Additionally, any claims that involve complex relationships or properties in a given domain often necessitate rigorous proof to establish their validity. In essence, any assertion that goes beyond basic definitions or established facts generally requires a proof.
knowledge can be acquired by reading and studying different facts and situations. wisdom can be part of knowledge and of spiritual gift given by supernatural being like GOD.
given theses additional facts
the amount of money you actually earn during a given pay period
You can read many facts about Mount Everest at the link I have given.
The type of reasoning you are describing is deductive reasoning. In deductive reasoning, conclusions logically follow from the given premises or facts.
You can read lots of facts about Mount Everest and its climbers at the link given
the raw facts given to the comuter are called data
We can not answer this question. We don't know the situations given you.
Deductive