True
For Apex the answer is “True“.
Assuming that you mean not (p or q) if and only if P ~(PVQ)--> P so now construct a truth table, (just place it vertical since i cannot place it vertical through here.) P True True False False Q True False True False (PVQ) True True True False ~(PVQ) False False False True ~(PVQ)-->P True True True False if it's ~(P^Q) -->P then it's, P True True False False Q True False True False (P^Q) True False False False ~(P^Q) False True True True ~(P^Q)-->P True True False False
true
True
Sharecropper's Seed was created on 2007-04-03.
The portion of the crop the landowner owed to the sharecropper
The sharecropper worked on the farm in exchange for a portion of the crops.
1975
The portion of the crop the landowner owed to the sharecropper
The portion of the crop the landowner owned to the sharecropper
The sharecropper worked on the farm and paid a portion of the crop as rent to the landowner.
It is 'probably true' that all these contracts heavily favored the landowner. He kept the books and could manipulate costs and profits at will. And of course: no profit, no profit share and payment for the sharecropper. Also, it is true that many landowners had a 'company store' that the sharecroppers were obliged to use. So, even if there was a profit share, most or all of it went to the payment of the debt run up at that store.
plummer
the word hsdfsf
There is no synonym for sharecropper.
tenant farmer